SKU: 16755617776
philodendron golden dragon scientific name

philodendron golden dragon scientific name Golden Dragon 'Philodendron' 6" Pot / Light Green / Without Pot

Sale price$19.40 Regular price$21.56
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

philodendron golden dragon scientific name Golden Dragon 'Philodendron' 6" Pot / Light Green / Without PotThe 'Golden Dragon' Philodendron is a striking tropical climbing plant known for its uniquely shaped foliage and vibrant, ever changing variegation. Some leaves may exhibit bold golden streaks, while others may have subtle lime green marbling. Additionally, as the plant matures, the leaf shape evolves significantly, transitioning from simple juvenile leaves to complex, dragon like formations. This transformation makes it a highly dynamic and visually

The 'Golden Dragon' Philodendron is a striking tropical climbing plant known for its uniquely shaped foliage and vibrant, ever-changing variegation. Some leaves may exhibit bold golden streaks, while others may have subtle lime-green marbling. Additionally, as the plant matures, the leaf shape evolves significantly, transitioning from simple juvenile leaves to complex, dragon-like formations. This transformation makes it a highly dynamic and visually interesting houseplant. 

While Philodendron 'Golden Dragon' is its most widely recognized name, it is sometimes referred to as the Dragon Mask Philodendron due to its unusual leaf shape.

The popular climbing houseplant Philodendron 'Golden Dragon' is a cultivated hybrid from Thailand.

While its exact parentage is not widely documented, it shares many traits with Philodendrons native to humid, tropical regions.

It thrives in warm, shaded environments, mimicking the understory of dense jungle habitats.

The most distinctive feature of Philodendron 'Golden Dragon' is its dramatic, deeply lobed leaves.

When young, the leaves appear simple and elongated, but as they mature, they develop intricate splits and jagged edges resembling the face of a mythical dragon.

The foliage boasts a variegated mix of green, yellow, and gold hues, which adds to its ornamental appeal. Unlike many Philodendrons that require high humidity to develop large leaves, this hybrid can adapt well to average household conditions. 

The Golden dragon Philodendron is a climbing variety that can grow up to 8 feet tall when supported by a moss pole or trellis. The leaves can grow up to 2 feet in length, creating a lush, jungle-like appearance. Without support, it may sprawl outward and produce smaller leaves, but its natural growth habit is to climb rather than crawl.  

If placed next to a wall, it might lean against it, but it won’t truly climb unless there’s something for its aerial roots to attach to. A rough surface, like a moss-covered board or textured wall, can help encourage climbing.

The flowers of your golden dragon plant emerge as a spadix wrapped in a pale green or cream-colored spathe. However, since the plant is primarily grown for its foliage, most growers do not focus on encouraging blooms. Instead, the energy of the plant is best directed toward leaf development. 

When and How to Water Your Philodendron Golden Dragon 

It is a drought-tolerant plant that stores moisture in its thick stems and can endure short dry spells without much stress. While it thrives in consistent moisture, overwatering can lead to root rot, making well-draining soil essential. The plant’s ability to tolerate dryness makes it an excellent low-maintenance choice for those who may forget to water frequently.

In the spring and summer, during the active growing season, the plant requires more frequent watering. Watering once every 7–10 days is ideal, ensuring the soil remains slightly moist but not soggy. The frequency may vary depending on humidity and temperature. If grown outdoors in warm climates, checking the top inch of soil before watering is essential. If it feels dry, it’s time to water. Indoor plants may need slightly less frequent watering compared to those grown outdoors. 

In fall and winter, during the dormant seasons, the Philodendron Golden Dragon enters a slower growth phase and requires less water. During these months, watering should be reduced to once every 2–3 weeks to prevent root rot. It’s crucial to let the soil dry out between watering sessions, as the plant’s metabolism slows down, requiring less moisture intake. 

Light Requirements – Where to Place Your Golden Dragon Plant 

For outdoor growth, this plant does best in partial shade with exposure to morning sunlight and afternoon shade.

It thrives in 4–6 hours of bright, indirect sunlight daily, making it ideal for placement under large trees, shaded patios, or greenhouses.

While it can tolerate some direct sunlight, prolonged exposure to harsh afternoon sun can scorch the leaves, causing browning and damage. 

When grown in different light conditions, the plant’s leaf variegation may change.

More light results in brighter, well-defined variegation, while lower light can lead to darker, more uniform green foliage. 

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs

The Philodendron Golden Dragon thrives in well-drained, nutrient-rich soil. Avoid compact or heavy soils that hold excess moisture, as this can lead to root rot. Ideally, you want to use our specialized potting mix, opens in a new tab that contains 5 natural substrates and organic mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your Philodendron to thrive. 

Fertilization is essential during the growing season in the spring to encourage robust growth and vibrant foliage. A liquid NPK fertilizer (5-10-5) diluted to half strength, applied once a year, provides the necessary nutrients. Slow-release fertilizers can also be used for sustained feeding over time. During the fall and winter dormant season, stop fertilization since the plant’s growth slows down. Over-fertilizing during this period can lead to salt buildup in the soil, potentially harming the roots. 

Hardiness Zones & More 

When growing indoors as a houseplant, the Golden Dragon Philodendron prefers temperatures between 65°F to 80°F. It thrives in moderate to high humidity levels, ideally 50% or higher. Using a pebble tray or humidifier can help maintain optimal humidity, especially in drier environments. Bright, indirect light is crucial indoors, ensuring the plant remains healthy and vibrant. 

In the United States, this is mostly an indoor plant, but if you live in southern Florida or Hawaii, then you can cultivate it outdoors in USDA zones 9-11.

It can be grown in the ground or in pots placed under partial shade.

It requires humidity levels above 50%, making tropical and subtropical regions ideal.

In cooler climates, it should be brought indoors when temperatures drop below 55°F, as prolonged exposure to cold can cause leaf damage. 

Wildlife Golden Dragon Flowers Attract the Following Friendly Pollinators 

While Philodendron Golden Dragon is mainly grown for its decorative foliage, its flowers do attract some pollinators. When mature, it produces an inflorescence similar to other aroids, which can attract insects like beetles and certain bees that are naturally drawn to these plants. However, it rarely blooms indoors.

According to the ASPCA, Philodendron Golden Dragon is mildly toxic to humans, cats, dogs, and other pets due to the presence of insoluble calcium oxalates. If ingested in a large amount, it can cause irritation, drooling, and gastrointestinal discomfort. However, it is safe to touch and handle, making it a popular choice for indoor houseplants. 

How to Propagate Your Philodendron Golden Dragon

The Philodendron Golden Dragon propagation can be done through stem cuttings. Select a healthy stem with at least one or two nodes and trim it using sterilized shears. The cutting can be placed in water or directly in soil. If you propagate in water, change the water every few days to prevent bacterial growth. After 2–4 weeks, roots will develop, and the cutting can be transferred into soil. If propagating in soil, keep it slightly moist until roots establish. 

Key Takeaways

  1. The leaves of Philodendron 'Golden Dragon' feature a dynamic mix of green, yellow, and golden variegation that changes as the plant matures, making each leaf unique.
  2. This Philodendron is a climbing variety, using aerial roots to attach to supports like moss poles or trellises. Providing a climbing structure helps it develop larger, more defined foliage.
  3. It thrives best indoors in bright, indirect light and warm temperatures, making it an excellent houseplant.
  4. This plant has moderate drought tolerance and can withstand occasional missed waterings, but it still prefers consistent moisture without being overwatered.
  5. Its jagged, deeply lobed leaves resemble a dragon’s face, giving it a distinct, exotic look that sets it apart from other Philodendrons.

The Bottom Line

Overall, the Philodendron 'Golden Dragon' is a unique and visually captivating hybrid that combines ease of care with an exotic appearance. Its ability to adapt to a range of conditions, along with its bold, deeply lobed leaves, makes it an excellent choice for both beginner and experienced plant collectors. Whether grown indoors as a statement piece or allowed to climb in a tropical garden, this plant adds an unmatched touch of wild beauty to any space. With minimal watering needs, well-draining soil, and proper humidity, it rewards growers with lush, dragon-shaped leaves that enhance any space. Order your very own Philodendron Golden Dragon for sale today!

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 16755617776

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell philodendron golden dragon scientific name

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1532 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 5
Does the job.
Works as a paper towel holder. Its a stick. It doesnt look like a cheap stick and it didn't break. Which means it met all my criteria. Great job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
Lisa S.
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012
C
Verified Purchase
Cari Ring
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 4
Excellent analysis, decent theorizing
Format: Kindle
While the analysis and argumentation presented in The Bible among the Myths is outstanding, the early chapters of the book suffer from a few problems. First - and this is mainly a complaint given my own preferences - the style of writing in chapters 1-4 differs noticeably from that of the rest of the book. While the introduction and chapters 5-10 reflect a learned, academic style, the first four chapters are written more casually, without quite the same rigor that characterizes most of Oswalt's writing. I am not entirely sure of the reason for this difference, and I wouldn't mention it if it were not for the second issue. These same chapters reflect their writing style in their content, so much so that I nearly gave up on the book after the first three chapters. While I appreciate the author's need to provide background information, definitions, and an overarching theoretical framework, his methodology as laid out in the text is much less rigorous than I would prefer to see. The first few chapters are much less heavily annotated, with fewer scholarly references and a great number of offhanded summaries. He labels his approach to the definition of "myth" as phenomenological, that is, examining the common characteristics of a variety of myths in order to summarize what is essential about them. However, his listings of these common characteristics are vague and poorly related to actual bodies of mythology that survive to the present day. Examples, when cited, are drawn almost exclusively from the Greek and Egyptian traditions. For the understanding of Israelite culture as it relates to its neighbors, this is certainly a fair beginning; for the definition of myth, which is a worldwide phenomenon transcending culture and geography, it seems very far from adequate. As someone who has a thorough knowledge of Christianity and Greco-Roman mythology and at least a nodding acquaintance with Egyptian, Norse/Germanic, and Celtic mythologies, I can at least begin to fill in some of the gaps in Oswalt's analysis. His generalizations, although sweeping, are not particularly problematic, but I am concerned that he embarks upon such a grand theoretical project without doing at least a little more specific analysis of various individual mythologies to demonstrate his points. More problematic in my opinion is that he groups all these various mythologies into a single worldview. Any number of scholars have tried to broaden the interpretations of myths to demonstrate that all cultures revert to the same basic narrative (The Golden Bough being the most famous example, and The Hero with a Thousand Faces being a more recent one); none of them has succeeded particularly well from a scholarly perspective. Despite this early weakness, Oswalt's work undergoes a dramatic improvement starting in chapter 5. His basic point - that the essential view of reality in Israel is demonstrably opposed to the view held by any of its neighbors - can be made without resorting to the sweeping claims of the earlier chapters, and he does an excellent job of presenting and analyzing the evidence for his view. His terminology (of "continuity" and "transcendence"), while not quite adequate to present an overarching definition and theory of what constitutes a myth, is certainly well-suited to his specific analysis. In particular, the analysis of the supposed parallels between the Enuma Elish and Genesis 1 is outstandingly done. After presenting a table with the usual outline of the Enuma Elish against the outline of Genesis 1, he simply proceeds to list the major plot events and how much time it takes to relate each one in the text itself. From this alone, it is readily apparent that the prevailing "outline" has intentionally been generated to encourage comparison to the Genesis account of creation. Such spurious efforts - minimizing the events of over 500 lines of poetry, while selecting 5 which bear questionable similarity to a verse in Genesis - are not honest scholarship, and kudos to Oswalt for pointing this out. I agree with a previous reviewer that it would have been helpful to append the text of the Enuma Elish in parallel with Genesis for readers to compare for themselves would have been a nice touch, but Oswalt's claims are not so elevated that they could not be disproven by direct appeal to the text. One final note. A previous reviewer noted that many of the authors Oswalt discusses wrote between the 60's and 80's, and complained that this made the book seem "dated." I am a graduate student in classics, and can assure those who are concerned that in any field dealing with antiquity, "dated" sources are often some of the most important. Unlike quantum physics, which has less than a century of history, the classic writings of antiquity and the history of those eras has been studied for over two millennia. Meaningful research begins, in fact, with the scholars of Alexandria who worked around 300 BCE; often the work they have done is not duplicated anywhere else. In the field of Ancient Near Eastern studies and Biblical studies in particular, there is likewise a long history of scholarly and interpretive effort. Sources less than a hundred years old are not dated - in the grand scheme of things, they are actually quite recent. It is also worth noting that many of the very recent books, which the reviewer presumably has in mind, are written for a popular audience and would not be considered truly scholarly efforts. Some are written by scholars, but those specific books are unlikely to come up in a serious academic analysis of the subject. The views entertained by those books, however, are very clearly addressed in The Bible among the Myths - largely because the scholarly arguments they were based on are much older than most people assume. Just because Oswalt does not mention names of popular authors does not mean that his argument fails to cover all its bases. All in all, the book is well written and persuasive. The earlier chapters might be found in any popular book on the subject, but the later chapters are more clearly of a scholarly bent, with corresponding vocabulary; readers who are looking for more of a lay approach to the issues may want to look for another author. However, the analysis of parallels between the Old Testament and the surviving Ancient Near Eastern literature is well-presented and balanced, and Oswalt's treatment of other scholars in the field seems to be fair. (I have not read any of their works myself, but Oswalt presents both strengths and weaknesses when considering whether an author's position is sufficiently explanatory and praises some aspects of works he disagrees with. He also is willing to point out when he agrees with some of the author's data, but draws a different conclusion. All of this strikes me as favorable.) The later chapters are thoroughly referenced in endnotes and draw from a variety of sources. Chapters 1-4: 3.5 stars Chapters 5-10: 5 stars Overall: 4.5 stars
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2014

recommand products