SKU: 26228454803
philodendron plant poisonous to humans

philodendron plant poisonous to humans Moonlight Philodendron

Sale price$23.00 Regular price$25.55
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

philodendron plant poisonous to humans Moonlight PhilodendronThe Moonlight Philodendron is a beautiful and popular houseplant that has fluorescent yellow leaves that add a pop of color to your home. It is a tropical hybrid characterized by glossy, color changing leaves that change from bright neon yellow to a brilliant green color. Native to South America, the name Moonlight was inspired by the plants stunning chartreuse to lime colored leaves, which reflect and catch light in a way that appears to glow, much

The Moonlight Philodendron is a beautiful and popular houseplant that has fluorescent yellow leaves that add a pop of color to your home. It is a tropical hybrid characterized by glossy, color-changing leaves that change from bright neon yellow to a brilliant green color. 

Native to South America, the name “Moonlight” was inspired by the plant’s stunning chartreuse-to-lime-colored leaves, which reflect and catch light in a way that appears to glow, much like moonlight itself.

This plant is sometimes simply referred to as the “Moonlight Philodendron” or “Lemon Philodendron” due to its lemony hue.

The Philodendron Moonlight is a clump-forming, self-heading plant, meaning it doesn’t climb but rather grows in a bushy form.

This unique growth pattern makes it compact and well-suited for indoor settings. It typically reaches a mature size of about 4 feet tall and wide, though in optimal outdoor conditions, it can grow larger. 

The leaves are broad, egg-shaped, and leathery in texture, giving the plant a lush and full look. New leaves emerge in bright yellow or lime green and gradually deepen to a medium green as they mature, providing a striking contrast on the plant itself. 

While the flowers of Philodendron Moonlight rarely bloom indoors, mature plants may develop white or light green spathes, which resemble the blooms of peace lilies. These flowers are subtle compared to the plant’s foliage, but they add a unique touch to the plant when they do appear. To encourage flowering, the plant must have ample warmth, humidity, and light.

One of the most notable benefits of the Philodendron Moonlight is its air-purifying qualities. It helps to remove common indoor air pollutants, including formaldehyde and benzene, by absorbing these toxins and converting them into oxygen. Having this plant indoors can improve air quality, contributing to a healthier living environment. Its low-maintenance care requirements and compact size also make it a practical choice for offices, bedrooms, and small apartments.

It’s often used as an accent plant in homes and offices, bringing a pop of color to minimalist decor or complementing other green foliage in plant arrangements. Whether as a standalone statement or as part of a collection, this philodendron makes a striking addition that suits various aesthetic styles.

When and How to Water Your Moonlight Philodendron 

The drought-tolerant Philodendron moonlight plant doesn't need a lot of water to thrive. This means you can let the soil dry out somewhat between waterings to prevent overwatering, which can lead to root rot. When watering your Philodendron Moonlight, make sure to water it thoroughly but allow the top inch or so of the soil to dry out before watering again.

In the spring and summer, during the growing season, your Philodendron moonlight may appreciate a bit more hydration typically every 1-2 weeks. You can increase the frequency of watering slightly during this period to support its growth. Water the plant when the top inch of soil feels dry to the touch, ensuring that excess water can drain out of the pot to prevent waterlogged soil.

During the fall and winter months when the plant is dormant, modify your watering schedule to correspond with its slower growth rate. During these cooler months, the Philodendron Moonlight will require less water typically once a month, so you can space out your watering sessions. Allow the soil to dry out a bit more between waterings, but still ensure the plant receives adequate hydration to maintain its health during the dormant period. By adjusting your watering routine based on the plant's growth stages, you can help your Philodendron Moonlight thrive throughout the year. 

Light Requirements – Where to Place Your Philodendron moonlight 

When grown indoors, the Philodendron moonlight plant enjoys bright, indirect light for at least 4-6 hours a day. It thrives in spaces with ample natural light but without direct sunlight, which can scorch its leaves. You can place your Philodendron Moonlight near a window where it can receive filtered sunlight or use sheer curtains to diffuse the light.

If your indoor space lacks natural light, you can supplement with artificial grow lights to meet the plant's light needs.

For outdoor cultivation, ensure it is in a location that offers bright, indirect light. Avoid exposing the plant to direct sunlight, especially during the intense midday sun, as this can cause sunburn on the leaves.

Providing a shaded spot with filtered sunlight or dappled shade can create an ideal outdoor environment for your Philodendron Moonlight to thrive.

Remember to monitor the plant's response to its new outdoor setting and adjust its placement if needed to optimize its light exposure.

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs 

The Moonlight Philodendron prefers well-drained soil to avoid root rot. A good mix for this plant is a well-aerated, peat-based potting mix that retains some moisture but allows excess water to drain away. Make sure the pot has drainage holes to let excess water escape. Instead, make or buy a well-draining potting mix, or ideally use our specialized potting mix, opens in a new tab that contains 5 natural substrates and mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your plant to thrive.

In terms of fertilizing your moonlight plant, during the growing season in spring, you can feed it with a balanced NPK fertilizer once a year. This will provide the plant with essential nutrients to support its growth and keep its foliage vibrant. However, during the fall and winter months when the plant is in its dormant phase, you can reduce or stop fertilizing altogether since the plant's growth slows down during this time. 

Remember not to over-fertilize your plant, as this can lead to mineral buildup in the soil, causing harm to the plant. Always follow the instructions on the fertilizer packaging and adjust the feeding schedule based on the plant's growth and the time of year.

Hardiness Zones & More 

When growing indoors, this Philodendron plant thrives in typical indoor temperatures ranging from 65°F to 80°F. It's essential to avoid exposing the plant to sudden temperature fluctuations, drafts, or cold air, as this can stress the plant and affect its growth. Keeping the indoor humidity levels around 40% to 60% can create an ideal environment for your Philodendron Moonlight, preventing issues like dry leaf tips or yellowing. 

For outdoor cultivation, it typically thrives in bright, indirect light in USDA zones 10 to 11, where temperatures are consistently warm. These zones generally experience mild winters and warm to hot summers, providing ideal conditions for tropical plants to flourish.

If you live in a region outside these zones but still want to grow this plant outdoors, consider using containers that can be moved indoors during colder months to protect the plant from frost or freezing temperatures. 

Wildlife Moonlight Plants Attracts the Following Friendly Pollinators

The Philodendron Moonlight plant can attract pollinators like bees, hummingbirds, butterflies, and insects with its beautiful foliage and sometimes flowers. These pollinators play a crucial role in the plant's reproduction process by transferring pollen from one flower to another, aiding in the production of seeds and fruits.  

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

According to the ASPCA, the Moonlight Philodendron plant is considered mildly toxic to humans, cats, and dogs if ingested in large amounts. While touching the Moonlight Philodendron is safe, ingesting even a small bite can cause symptoms such as oral irritation, drooling, and mild discomfort. Eating larger amounts may lead to more severe symptoms, including vomiting and difficulty swallowing. Always wash your hands after handling the plant and keep it out of reach of pets and children. 

How to Propagate Your Philodendron Moonlight

To propagate your Philodendron moonlight plant, you can use stem cuttings. Select a healthy stem with a few leaves and make a clean cut just below a node. Remove the lower leaves to expose the node. Place the cutting in water or a well-draining soil mix, ensuring the node is submerged or covered. Keep the cutting in a warm, humid environment with indirect light. Roots should start to develop in a few weeks. Once the roots are established, you can transplant the cutting into a pot with a potting mix suitable for Philodendrons. Regularly water the new plant and provide it with indirect light to help it thrive and grow into a mature Moonlight Philodendron. 

Key Takeaways 

  1. Philodendron Moonlight is celebrated for its vibrant, neon green to yellow leaves that appear to glow, especially under bright, indirect light. This unique color has earned it the name “Moonlight,” as its leaves resemble a soft, illuminated effect.
  2. Unlike many philodendrons, which are known for climbing or trailing, Moonlight is a self-heading variety. This means it grows in a compact, bushy shape rather than vining, making it ideal for indoor spaces where vertical space is limited.
  3. It has air-purifying properties, helping to remove toxins like formaldehyde from indoor environments. This can improve air quality, making it a practical choice for homes and offices.
  4. It is relatively drought-tolerant once established, able to go without water for short periods. While it prefers consistently moist soil, it can handle occasional dry spells, making it a resilient choice for plant owners who may occasionally forget a watering.

The Bottom Line 

Overall, the Philodendron Moonlight is a visually striking and easy-care plant, perfect for adding vibrant color and life to any indoor space. With its glowing lime-green foliage and compact, self-heading growth habit, this philodendron is ideal for those looking to make a statement without needing extensive care. As a resilient, drought-tolerant plant, it thrives in bright, indirect light but can adapt to lower light conditions, making it suitable for various home or office settings. To keep it happy, provide well-draining soil and water when the top inch of soil feels dry, allowing it to dry out slightly between waterings. Additionally, its natural air-purifying abilities and relatively low maintenance needs make it an excellent choice for both new and experienced plant enthusiasts. With the Philodendron Moonlight, buyers can enjoy an attractive, low-maintenance plant that not only enhances their space but also contributes to a healthier indoor environment. 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 26228454803

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell philodendron plant poisonous to humans

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 1700 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
AlbMonk
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey. "The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story. Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind. Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution. Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
W
Verified Purchase
West Virginia Born
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position! I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth". Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts. Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end: "...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see." While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded. Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
K
Verified Purchase
Kathy Sund prescher
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
M
Verified Purchase
michaelshive
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close. Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
J
Verified Purchase
J. Thomas Campbell
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years. Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One. Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order. So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular. These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence: we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve. And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine. As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts. Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!") I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch. The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been. In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox! (NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website. Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012

recommand products