SKU: 31191805060
hanging plant that looks like hair

hanging plant that looks like hair Shop 'Monkey Tail Cactus 'Care and Growers Guide'

Sale price$18.57 Regular price$20.63
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.16 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 17 - Sep 22

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

hanging plant that looks like hair Shop 'Monkey Tail Cactus 'Care and Growers Guide'Introducing the Monkey Tail Cactus, known as Cleistocactus colademononis, which is perfect for hanging baskets. This unique cactus features long, trailing stems that resemble a monkey's tail, making it a fun and eye catching addition to any indoor or outdoor space. Native to the high altitude regions of Bolivia and Argentina, the Cleistocactus colademononis gets its name "Monkey Tail" due to its long, slender, and hanging stems. Sometimes it is also

Introducing the Monkey Tail Cactus, known as Cleistocactus colademononis, which is perfect for hanging baskets. This unique cactus features long, trailing stems that resemble a monkey's tail, making it a fun and eye-catching addition to any indoor or outdoor space.

Native to the high-altitude regions of Bolivia and Argentina, the Cleistocactus colademononis gets its name "Monkey Tail" due to its long, slender, and hanging stems.

Sometimes it is also known as, cleistocactus winteri or Hildewintera colademononis. 

This monkey tail species is known for its long, thin stems covered in soft, white fuzzy hair-like spines.

Its young form is upright, but as it matures, the stems develop a trailing habit.

The money tail plant is suitable for hanging baskets or tall planters as the "tails" can grow over 5 feet long.

The Monkey tail cactus flowers are bright red to orange and tubular in shape. The monkey tail cactus is a free-flowering species, displaying short-lived blooms in warm spring and summer months. However, it can repeat its blooms throughout the growing season when conditions are right.

When and How to Water Your Monkey Tail Cactus   

When it comes to watering your monkey tail plant, it's important to strike the right balance. Often, people worry they aren't giving their plants enough water when in reality they are over-watering them. This is especially the case with cacti as they don't do well in moist soil which can result in root rot. Before watering, make sure that the top two inches of soil are completely dry.  

In the spring and summer growing seasons, you can water your monkey tail cactus thoroughly, allowing the water to soak the soil completely. But remember, it's crucial to let the soil dry out before watering again. Overwatering can lead to root rot, which is not good for the cactus. 

During the dormant period in fall and winter, you'll want to reduce watering. The cactus enters a rest phase during this time, so it requires less water. You can water it sparingly, allowing the soil to dry out between waterings. Just keep an eye on the cactus and adjust the watering schedule based on its needs. 

Remember, every cactus is unique, so it's essential to observe your Monkey Tail Cactus closely. If the stems start to shrivel or turn yellow, it may be a sign of underwatering. On the other hand, if the stems become mushy or discolored, it could indicate overwatering. Adjust the watering accordingly to keep your cactus happy and healthy! 

Light Requirements - Where to Place Your Monkey Tail Cactus  

When growing your monkey tail cactus indoors, it thrives in bright but indirect light. Find a spot near a window where it can receive plenty of sunlight throughout the day. However, be careful not to expose it to direct sunlight, especially during the hottest parts of the day, as it can scorch the delicate stems. If you notice the stems stretching towards the light, it may be an indication that it needs more bright light. You can consider using a grow light to supplement the natural light if necessary. 

If you decide to grow your Monkey Tail Cactus outdoors, it will appreciate a spot with full sun exposure.

Place it in an area where it can receive at least 4-6 hours of direct sunlight each day. This Cleistocactus colademononis loves warmth and can tolerate high temperatures, so it will do well in a sunny outdoor location.

Just make sure to acclimate it gradually to the outdoor conditions to avoid sunburn. Start by placing it in a partially shaded area and gradually increase the exposure to the full sun over a few weeks. 

Remember, light is essential for the growth and health of your monkey tail plant, but it's crucial to find the right balance. Too little light can cause the stems to become weak and elongated, while too much direct sunlight can lead to sunburn. Observe your cactus closely and adjust its placement accordingly to ensure it receives the optimal amount of light. 

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs  

For the soil, the monkey tail cactus prefers a well-draining cactus soil that replicates its natural habitat. Planting them in ordinary soil will result in compacted roots, stunted growth, and most likely root rot. Instead, make or buy a well-draining potting mix, or ideally use our specialized cactus potting mix that contains 5 natural substrates and mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your monkey tail cactus to thrive. 

When it comes to fertilizing your monkey tail plant, it doesn't require a lot of nutrients. During the growing season in the spring, you can fertilize it once a year using a balanced (5-10-5) NPK fertilizer. Follow the instructions to determine the appropriate dosage. It's important not to over-fertilize, as this can cause damage to the Cleistocactus colademononis. During the dormant period in fall and winter, it's best to withhold fertilization. 

Additionally, it's a good practice to water your cactus thoroughly before applying fertilizer. This helps prevent any potential damage to the roots. Always remember to dilute the fertilizer in water and apply it to moist soil. Avoid applying fertilizer to dry soil, as it can lead to fertilizer burn. 

Common Naming Confusion

This plant is commonly confused with rat tail cactus due to its trailing nature. Both have long, trailing stems resembling tails, but the monkey-tail cactus has thicker stems and spines, while the rat-tail cactus has thinner, more delicate stems and no spines. Additionally, the rat tail cactus has larger, showier flowers with a wider range of colors. 

Hardiness Zone & More  

When growing indoors, the monkey tail cactus thrives in temperatures ranging from 60-80°F during the growing season. However, it can tolerate slightly colder temperatures down to 50°F. It's important to avoid exposing it to extreme cold or sudden temperature drops, as this can cause damage to the plant. 

For outdoor cultivation, your monkey cactus is well-suited to USDA zones 9-11, mostly in Southern California and Florida.

So, if you live in a colder zone, it's best to keep Cleistocactus colademononis cactus as a houseplant or in a controlled environment where you can maintain the ideal conditions. 

In terms of humidity, the monkey tail plant is native to the arid regions of South America and can tolerate low humidity levels. It prefers dry air, similar to what you would find in desert environments. Indoor humidity levels are usually higher, but as long as you provide good airflow and avoid excessive moisture around the plant, it should be fine. 

In terms of temperature, the Monkey Tail Cactus enjoys warm weather and can withstand temperatures up to 100°F in its natural habitat. However, it's always a good idea to provide some shade during the hottest part of the day to prevent sunburn. 

Wildlife - Monkey Tail Cactus Attracts the Following Friendly Pollinators

The Monkey Tail Cactus attracts a variety of pollinators such as bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds with its bright flowers and sweet nectar. These friendly pollinators play a crucial role in the cactus's reproduction and overall ecosystem health.

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

According to the ASPCA, the Monkey Tail Cactus is not toxic to humans or pets, but if handled incorrectly, its spines can cause skin irritation.

How to Propagate Your Monkey Tail Cactus

The Monkey Tail Cactus can be propagated through stem cuttings. Simply allow the cuttings to dry for a few days before placing them in well-draining soil. With proper money tail cactus care and time, the cuttings will develop roots into new growth.

Pruning

The Monkey Tail Cactus is a low-maintenance plant that doesn’t require regular pruning, but you can remove broken, dying, or dead stems to keep it healthy. However, since the tails can grow up to 5 feet long, you can trim them shorter if they become too lengthy, such as clipping them to around 3 feet. Interestingly, the trimmed sections can be used for propagation by allowing the cuttings to callous over and then planting them in well-draining soil, giving you a chance to grow new plants from the trimmings.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Monkey Tail Cactus is an excellent choice for hanging baskets, thanks to its long, trailing stems covered in soft, silvery-white spines. Its cascading growth habit creates a stunning visual display, especially when adorned with its vibrant red flowers.
  2. The Monkey Tail Cactus, named for its trailing stems resembling a monkey's tail, grows up to 5 feet and is covered with soft, hair-like spines.
  3. The plant produces vibrant red, tubular flowers in spring and summer, which attract hummingbirds for pollination, adding to its charm.
  4. Native to Bolivia, this cactus is an epiphytic species, often growing on rocks or trees in its natural habitat. It's perfect for hanging baskets, where its trailing stems can be showcased.
  5. This drought-tolerant Monkey tail Cactus should be watered sparingly and allow the soil to dry completely between waterings.

The Bottom Line 

Overall, the Monkey Tail Cactus (Cleistocactus colademononis) is a captivating cactus with long, hanging stems that resemble a monkey's tail. Its unique features, such as the transition from spines to a smooth stem and vibrant tubular flowers, make it a standout plant. Taking care of your monkey tail plant involves providing it with well-drained soil, ample sunlight, and occasional watering. With its striking appearance and relatively easy care, the Monkey Tail Cactus is a fantastic addition to any cactus collection or as a hanging plant that adds a touch of natural beauty to your space. We think you will love this plant – order your very own monkey tail cactus for sale today and start enjoying its beauty in no time! 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 31191805060

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell hanging plant that looks like hair

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 27 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
Eric Balkan
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
When and where economics went wrong
Format: Paperback
This is one of those books that can provide an epiphany to the reader -- but not very many American readers have even heard of it, unfortunately. That could be due to it's being a book primarily about English economic history, with assumptions that the reader is familiar to some extent with things like the Poor Laws and Tory socialism. But I wasn't, and was still able to glean some great insights from the work. That could be because Polanyi is not afraid of repetition. :-) A key insight, and the one that could be summed up as the theme of the book, is Polanyi's realization that prior to about 1830, the market and the economy were considered part of society. That is, economic activity was something that people did along with everything else they did, like engage in social/familial relationships, religious rituals, etc. But with the 1830s came a paradigm shift: the advent of rational capitalism. Now, the market was considered an entity by itself, outside of society. This market entity was viewed as governed by universal laws. Like laws of physics, these market laws were independent of culture, independent of social group, independent of time period, and, in fact, independent of human behavior. While any observer of human nature would say that people often make decisions for emotional reasons -- and modern neurological research shows that virtually every decision we make is a combination of the rational and the emotional -- these market laws assumed only rational behavior on the part of economic actors. Though Polanyi doesn't mention it, it's now easy to see how Alfred Marshall could get carried away with creating a mathematical foundation for microeconomics and how Leon Walras could, reportedly, say that if something couldn't be studied mathematically, it wasn't worth studying. There's no current way to model emotions with math, and so the Ricardian prototype of an emotion-less economics continues into the modern economics of today. These universal market laws frees the market from any social constraints. A number of modern neo-classical economists assert that this makes economics purely amoral, i.e., without regard for any ethics. Therefore any attempts by the public, by politicians, or by workers to add ethics to the market is an interference with pure market workings, which, according to their interpretation of Adam Smith's "invisible hand", will produce optimal results if just left alone. But Smith never said that, and in fact rational capitalism, in elevating greed and selfishness to the status of goals -- see the Ayn Rand work "The Virtue Of Selfishness" -- is, IMO, not amoral at all, but rather is a morality of its own. Anyway, back to Polanyi's insights. Another key one is the concept of a "double movement" in 19th century England. Each move to create a purer market created an ad-hoc counter move. E.g., Ricardian free trade was faced with opposition from workers losing their jobs and local firms losing business Americans can easily think of another example: where the employment of children (eventually) led to laws restricting that employment, simply because human beings have too much of a sympathetic nature to sit still for children losing limbs in the dangerous factories and mines of the time. Polanyi notes that capitalists often blame these anti-capitalist laws on planned activity by socialist anti-market groups, but he says they're actually the result of the recognition by the general public that they don't want to live under a pure market system. Yet another good insight is Polanyi's recognition that market laws treat labor, land, and money as commodities. We can see that today, where neo-classical economists assert that the law of supply and demand should apply to workers as it applies to anything else in the economy. That is, if there's a surplus of workers in one area and a shortage in another, supply and demand dictates the flow of workers from the one area to the other. But a laid-off textile worker in South Carolina is not going to move to China for a job. That's my own example, but Polanyi offers his own from modern English history. The book isn't perfect. Polanyi does have a tendency to generalize, a common failing among authors, IMO. E.g., in discussing the rise of fascism in the 1930s, he's on very shaky ground when he starts talking about the US or about Russian policy intentions during that period. I gave The Great Transformation 5 stars because, even with its faults, the reader will be thinking about Polanyi's insights for some time to come. I am.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2009
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
Not light reading but worth it
Format: Kindle
Much of this book was heavy reading for me, mainly due my not being familiar with the background development and history of various economic theory and associated laws over 500 or so years of British history. I did stick it out and am glad I did. There are many insights as to how we have arrived at today and the book is still relevant even though it was written in 1942. I found the last few chapters and the comments in Sources to offer the most explanations to fit modern times especially with regard to the rise of fascism. Thick but worth it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2025
B
Verified Purchase
Blake West
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Interesting anthropology and critique, but dense and obtuse writing
Format: Kindle
The good part is that at the end of the day, I learned a lot here, and Polanyi raised a lot of very interesting and under-discussed historical points to create his argument. It felt very similar to David Graeber (or I guess Graeber is similar to Polanyi) in that way. The bad part is that, whereas Graeber writes with exceptional clarity and vividness, Polanyi is obtuse and dense. And I've read other books from this era, I don't think it's the time. I think it's Polanyi's writing. Beyond that, his work serves more as analysis than prescription. It's a bit unclear exactly what he's advocating for. Which maybe is OK, though I prefer when non fiction writers offer solutions rather than just pointing out problems. All in all, if you can settle in with his writing, there are definite gems in there.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kitty Bryant
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Inspiring analysis of economic history
Format: Paperback
Polanyi presents economic history through an analysis of the "utopian" catastrophy of the self-regulating market economy. Polanyi argues that the free market economy treats the most essential elements of human society - labor, nature, and money - as if they should be exploited like commodities. When liberalism (free marketeerism) rules, then the economy dictates what is possible in human society, and these rules are intolerable because they create conditions under which humans are impoverished and disempowered. In his final chapter he lays out the battle ground between liberalism and its alternatives, which when he was writing (1945) were socialism and fascism. Fascism refuses the dictates of economic liberalism but substitutes in its place the dictates of a state that denies individual freedom. Socialism, alternatively, holds the only promise of true freedom for the individual where economic and political rules are developed and enforced democratically for the protection of society. While this is not an easy read because it demands a background in history, he is a fluent and persuasive writer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2023
F
Verified Purchase
Freh
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
This 1944 classic recounts the fatal flaws of market liberalism that led to the Great Depression and World Wars I & II
Format: Paperback
The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Karl Polanyi. 1944. In 1944, the opposing monumental classics, The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek and The Great Transformation by Karl Polanyi, were published. From the right, Hayek argued that market liberalism led to prosperity, political liberty, and prevention of authoritarian governance. From the left, Polanyi argued that the rise of market liberalism during the industrial revolution led to intolerable hardship, inevitable unsustainable countermeasures, and finally collapse into fascism, the Great Depression, and World Wars I and II. Since their publication during World War II, these markedly opposed ideas have now been tested by seventy years of history. For the first thirty years after the war, policies reflecting Polanyi’s ideas led to a mixed economy of government policies and regulated markets in the US, northern Europe, and elsewhere that produced robustly increased prosperity broadly shared at all income levels. For the next forty years, ascendency of Hayek’s ideas led to reduction of the role of government with attendant economic instability, rising inequality (with all economic gains going to the rich in the US), and coercive imposition of market liberalism by authoritarian governments with disastrous results throughout Latin America and the former Soviet Union. Given the adverse consequences of resurgent market liberalism, the rebuttal of its ideas in The Great Transformation is as important today as ever. In The Great Transformation, Polanyi maintains that before the industrial revolution, markets did not play an important role in human society—they were embedded in society rather than the other way around. Goods and services were generally distributed without the motive for profit by the non-market mechanisms of reciprocity according to social relations, centralized storage with redistribution, and production for one’s own use known as householding. When present, the role of markets was peripheral and subordinate to politics, religion, and social relations. The industrial revolution brought about an almost miraculous improvement in the tools of production accompanied by catastrophic dislocations of the lives of the common people, of which poverty was merely the economic aspect. During this time, English thinkers created the theory of market liberalism, which radically reversed the previous subordination of markets to society by removing the role for government so that society was instead subordinated to self-regulating markets (without government interference). This change required that human labor, nature, and money be turned into commodities that could be bought and sold without regard to human and social considerations. Efficient functioning of markets also required callous indifference to the social dislocation, poverty, and damage to nature that resulted and even to hunger as a motivating factor for the working class. This change from regulated to self-regulating markets that organized the whole of society on the principle of gain and profit marked a great transformation of the nature of society by the removal of democratic control of markets. The goals of this transformation were unrealistically utopian and could never be achieved without annihilating the human and natural substance of society. Even during its installation, laissez-faire proved to be a myth. Government action was mandatory to adjust the supply of money and credit, to enforce provisions for labor and land, and to prevent political disruption. Even with this level of government activity, market liberalism still imposed unsustainable hardships on ordinary people from speculative excess, growing inequality, competition from imports, depressions, unemployment, poverty, and reduced entitlement to assistance. By the late 1800s, these impossible pressures of the self-regulating market necessarily led to a countermovement in industrialized nations to protect their societies from the market. This countermovement included protectionism for national markets and competition for colonies to take resources from other societies. In exotic and colonial regions with the absence of protective measures unspeakable suffering resulted. Thus Polanyi characterizes market societies as having two opposing movements, referred to as a “double movement.” These two contradictory movements resulted in simultaneous struggles to expand the scope of the market because of the opportunities for some and to limit the scope of the market because of the adverse consequences for many. These internal contradictions led to disruptive stresses and strains that were unsustainable for market societies. In the domestic economy, class conflict resulted from issues like the choice between inflation for stability of workers incomes and employment and deflation for stability of currency for investors. Market liberals from Spencer to Mises held that popular democracy was a danger to capitalism and that workers should not have the right to vote. In the international economy, relentless shocks imposed by the gold standard forced nations to consolidate around heightened national and imperial boundaries. In international politics, intensified political, military, and economic rivalries finally culminated in World War I. By this time, the class struggle over market liberalism was at an impasse. For a critical decade, economic liberals supported authoritarian intervention in service of their deflationary policy to protect currency exchange and investment. This merely weakened the democratic forces that might otherwise have averted the fascist catastrophe. During the Great Depression, the gold standard finally collapsed, foreign debts were repudiated, capital markets and world trade dwindled away, and the global political and economic system disintegrated. In a second great transformation of society that followed, the replacements of market society by fascism, socialism, and the New Deal were similar only in discarding laissez-faire principles. The conflict between the market and the elementary requirements of an organized social life had ultimately destroyed society. World Wars I and II merely hastened its destruction. In 1944, Polanyi appears to have regarded the utopia of market liberalism as utterly discredited. He expressed the hope that the passing of market economy could become the beginning of an era of unprecedented freedom. He noted that freedom as the absence of power and compulsion as claimed by market liberals is not possible in a complex society. The function of power is to ensure the measure of conformity which is needed for the survival of the group: its ultimate source is opinion. Regulation both extends and restricts freedom; only the balance of freedoms lost and won is significant. The comfortable classes enjoy the freedom provided by leisure in security. They resent the suggestion to spread out income, leisure, and security to extend to others the freedom they enjoy. Obviously, those who lack security cannot enjoy the same freedom as the comfortable classes. Those who want more freedom for all need not fear that either power or planning will undermine their freedom. Regulation and control in a complex society strive to give us all the security we need to achieve freedom not only for the few, but for all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 22, 2017

recommand products