SKU: 54420231697
big fiddle leaf fig tree

big fiddle leaf fig tree Full Size Fiddle Leaf Fig

Sale price$19.00 Regular price$21.11
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $5.28 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 16 - Jul 21

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

big fiddle leaf fig tree Full Size Fiddle Leaf FigDescription The fiddle leaf fig brings natural elegance to your home. Its stunning violin shaped leaves transform any room into a sophisticated sanctuary. This West African beauty has won hearts worldwide with its dramatic presence and surprisingly forgiving nature. With those iconic leaves reaching up to 18 inches long, Ficus lyrata creates an instant focal point wherever you place her. Shes an absolute status symbol among modern decorators and plant

Description

The fiddle leaf fig brings natural elegance to your home. Its stunning violin-shaped leaves transform any room into a sophisticated sanctuary. This West African beauty has won hearts worldwide with its dramatic presence and surprisingly forgiving nature.

With those iconic leaves reaching up to 18 inches long, Ficus lyrata creates an instant focal point wherever you place her. She’s an absolute status symbol among modern decorators and plant-lovers. She's traded her wild rainforest home for designer living rooms, and we think she's made the right choice! 

This fiddle leaf fig plant grows steadily at 12-18 inches per year indoors, gracefully reaching 8-10 feet of living sculpture that brings warmth and character to your space.



Care 

Do fiddle leaf figs need direct sunlight? 

Your fiddle leaf fig loves bright, indirect sunlight. She'll appreciate gentle morning sun if you gradually introduce it, but harsh afternoon rays can leave it looking stressed and unhappy. East-facing windows give brightness without overwhelming its delicate leaves.


Is the fiddle leaf fig high maintenance?

We like to think of the fiddle leaf fig as just having clear preferences (but truthfully she is high maintenance). She simply knows what makes it happy and isn't shy about showing you! Once you understand its rhythm, it’s quite the agreeable companion. 

It appreciates consistent care, stable placement (it's not fond of being moved around), and the right balance of water and humidity. Master these basics, and you'll have a stunning statement piece that rewards your attention with years of beautiful growth.


Is the fiddle leaf fig a good indoor plant?

The fiddle leaf fig makes an absolutely wonderful indoor plant for those who appreciate both beauty and purpose in their green companions. It's particularly special because it naturally purifies your air while creating that sophisticated, magazine-worthy look.

Its large, glossy leaves make any room feel more alive and welcoming. It's perfect for bright living rooms, spacious bedrooms, or that corner that's been waiting for something special to bring it to life.


Do fiddle leaf figs like being in a bathroom? 

Fiddle leaf figs love a bathroom with a window because it gives them that perfect combination of humidity and gentle light. The natural moisture from your showers reminds it of its tropical home. Just make sure there's good natural light.


Do fiddle leaf figs need sun or shade? 

Fiddle leaf figs thrive with bright light and gentle protection—bright, indirect sunlight is exactly what makes them happiest. Think filtered sunshine rather than deep shade or harsh direct rays. They need enough light to maintain those gorgeous, glossy leaves.


How do I know if my fiddle leaf fig is happy? 

A content fiddle leaf fig will show you its displeasure through its beautiful, upright posture and those glossy green leaves that seem to shine with health. You'll notice steady new growth and a general sense of vitality about it.


Do fiddle leaf figs need to be by a window? 

Your fiddle leaf fig definitely needs to be near a window that offers bright, indirect light for at least six hours each day to maintain healthy growth. Avoid placing it where cold drafts might reach it during winter—it demands consistency.

Windows facing east work beautifully, offering gentle morning light. South-facing windows can work too if you use sheer curtains to soften the intensity. 


Where should I put my fiddle leaf fig indoors? 

The best spots for your fiddle leaf fig plant are near an east-facing window, in a bright bathroom with natural light, or grouped with other humidity-loving plants to create a lovely little ecosystem. It's happiest at temperatures between 60-85°F (16-29°C).

Avoid high-traffic areas where it might get bumped or jostled, spots near heating vents or air conditioners, and any dark corners where it'll struggle.


How often should I water my fiddle leaf fig? 

Water your fiddle leaf fig when the top 2-3 inches of soil feel dry to the touch—typically once weekly during spring and summer, less frequently in winter. Base your plans on checking the soil rather than following a strict schedule. 

When you do water, give it a slow, thorough drink until water runs from the drainage holes. Consistency is what it appreciates most, helping prevent those dramatic responses it's known for.


Should I mist my fiddle leaf fig? 

Misting your fiddle leaf fig every few days helps create the humid environment it naturally craves, bringing a bit of that rainforest feeling to your home. Use filtered or distilled water to prevent spots on its beautiful leaves. 

You can also place it on a pebble tray filled with water or use a humidifier nearby—it'll appreciate any effort to increase the moisture around it.


Should I put coffee grounds in my fiddle leaf fig? 

Please skip the coffee grounds for your fiddle leaf fig—they can change the soil's pH and sometimes encourage mold growth, which won't make it happy. Instead, stick with a balanced liquid houseplant fertilizer every 1-2 months during spring and summer.


Are fiddle leaf figs sensitive to tap water? 

Fiddle leaf figs are sensitive to the chemicals commonly found in tap water, like chlorine and fluoride. Using filtered water, distilled water, or simply letting tap water sit overnight before using it can make a real difference.


What fertilizer should I use on my fiddle leaf fig? 

A balanced, liquid houseplant fertilizer works wonderfully for fiddle leaf fig fertilizer needs—dilute to half strength and apply every 1-2 months during the growing season. During fall and winter, let it rest without any feeding. It's quite sensitive to over-fertilizing.



Pet-friendly?

The fiddle leaf fig isn't safe for pets, as it can cause oral irritation, drooling, and digestive upset if your curious companions decide to sample its leaves. While it's not severely toxic, it's best to keep it out of reach of both cats and dogs who might be tempted to explore.


Are fiddle leaf figs poisonous to cats?

Fiddle leaf figs can cause oral irritation, excessive drooling, and stomach upset if cats chew on the leaves. The sap can also irritate skin, so it's definitely a "look but don't touch" plant for both you and your feline friends.


Are fiddle leaf figs toxic to dogs? 

Fig leaf trees can cause mouth irritation, drooling, and digestive issues if dogs nibble on the leaves, so consider keeping in a room where your dog doesn't usually spend time, or up high where those exploring noses can't reach.


Factoids

How fast do fiddle leaf figs grow? 

When well cared for, fiddle leaf figs grow at a satisfying pace of 12-18 inches per year indoors, gradually developing into tall living sculptures… or just skip a step and buy our fiddle leaf fig that’s 9-10 feet tall already. Growth depends on consistent light, proper watering, and seasonal changes.

Fiddle leaf figs are most active during spring and summer, taking a natural rest during the cooler months. 


Do fiddle leaf figs clean the air? 

Your fiddle leaf fig does double duty as both a beautiful statement piece and a natural air purifier. It removes common household toxins like formaldehyde, benzene, and trichloroethylene, while adding fresh oxygen wherever you decide to place it.

NASA's Clean Air Study recognized fig plants as effective air cleaners, so it's essentially a living air filter that happens to look absolutely stunning while doing her job.


Do fiddle leaf figs represent anything? 

Fiddle leaf figs symbolize prosperity, abundance, and good fortune. They're also obviously symbols of excellent taste in interior design circles! In feng shui traditions, large leafy plants like the fiddle leaf fig tree represent growth and abundance.


How did fiddle leaf figs get their name? 

Fiddle leaf figs earned their charming name because of their distinctive violin-shaped leaves. It got its botanical name Ficus lyrata because of the lyre, a stringed instrument similar to the fiddles that are played in folk music.



Buy a Fiddle Leaf Fig

The Fiddle leaf fig is perfect for plant parents who appreciate both beauty and character. Give it what it needs, and it’ll reward your care with years of gorgeous growth and undeniable style. You can even choose one of the Full or Huge sizes on a call with our experts. 

Our fiddle leaf fig trees make stunning statement pieces that start conversations and pull in admiring glances with their graceful presence and air-purifying benefits.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 54420231697

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell big fiddle leaf fig tree

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick Neary
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
This can be the best for some people and potential trouble for others. BP warning:
Item Package Quantity: 1, Size: 100 Count (Pack of 1)
It triggers my bipolar mania. Even though this detrimental effect is short-lived - only a few hours before coming back to normal... I don't feel right taking this ever again in supplement form. It's ok in a Monster Energy Drink or a Starbucks Tripleshot coffee or something for me personally. Really it's in my opinion the best herbal supplement for energy that is somewhat adventurous and flexitive. For me more like go outside and play, climb pine trees or something. In contrast, I'll suggest this term: "GNC-type herbal stimulants" - they feel more oriented toward focus and less towards locomotive behavior.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2025
C
Verified Purchase
Craig Matteson
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
This wonderful biography focuses on what the contemporary records actually tell us.
Format: Paperback
I am very grateful to Richard Bushman for this book. Writing about Joseph Smith invites a storm of criticism because skeptics only want him debunked and believers want their faith supported. Each wants their pre-conceived image of who Joseph was to be proven correct. Bushman takes a strong stance that lets the evidence we have speak for itself, preferably as close to Joseph himself and contemporary witnesses as possible, and tell the story of his life to high scholarly standards. For me the book read somewhat sparer than a biography that includes anecdotes as if they are history. Many familiar stories that I learned growing up are simply not here. However, relying as much as possible on contemporary accounts and what Joseph himself wrote or said provides a a biography more consistent in its view of Joseph than the books that either extol him or those that tend to attack him and try to debunk him. For example, the famous Brodie biography seemed to me to want Joseph to be both a genius and a dolt, a highly energetic man yet lazy, a crazed believer and a cynical con man, and on and on with similar contradictions. Bushman achieves a more consistent lens on Joseph, despite the complications of the man and his life. I think this is both a great achievement and a real help in trying to understand Joseph. I mean it as high praise for the book when I say that I think that almost everyone who reads this book thoughtfully will take away a broader and deeper conception of who Joseph Smith was and what he did. Rather than try to recount the book to you I want to share several things that I learned from the book and really value. I could list dozens more, but you can read the book for yourself (which I encourage you to do). Yes, I am a believing member of the LDS Church, but I think the book is intelligent and honest and complete enough to provide interesting and thought provoking material for both the believer and the skeptic and for someone who comes with no knowledge of Joseph at all. Believers will have to consider the complications of the man and his flesh and blood temperament and the misjudgments he made in his life about the people he trusted and some of the actions he took. Skeptics will have to deal with the reality of the man and his achievements. Simply dismissing him as a con man or a crazed visionary will not work because that is not what the actual evidence says. Joseph did not run the Church as the single central figure nor did he turn it into a cult of Joseph Smith. Bushman showed me the power and genius of the organization of the Church and its balancing mechanisms of being flat with a broadly held male priesthood with a hierarchical leadership with doctrine of keys and how the later addition of women in the operation, governing of the Church, and caring of the needs of the Saints strengthened and enriched it. And while Joseph was the President of the Church and its Prophet and Seer he really did let local leadership govern itself according to the principles taught through the revelations. I think Bushman's focus on the development of the organization and its role in preserving the Church and its ongoing growth after Joseph's murder is spot on and helped deepen my appreciation of its dynamism and adaptability. I also like the compromise language Bushman achieved in dealing with the realities of the revelations of Joseph Smith. The author always refers to them as Joseph's revelations. For believers, we accept them as revelations from God through Joseph Smith, but I can see them as "Joseph's" in that they were given through him. And skeptics who reject anything divine about the revelations can accept that, whatever they are, Joseph spoke them. I also liked learning how many of the revelations were given in the presence of others in meetings, how matter of fact they were, how they were immediately copied and circulated, and how difficult it was to get them collected and printed for a variety of reasons until we finally got them published as the Doctrine and Covenants. Another thing I gained a deeper appreciation of was the utter daring and the monumental nature of building the Kirtland Temple so early in the Church's life. Most Mormon congregations (wards) have around 500 members. Kirtland at the time they were building the temple was growing, but only had around 600 members when the project began. I can't fathom taking on such a project with so few people and for a people living in log structures and less it is even more incredible. Yet they built it in that rugged frontier town. I also thought that Bushman handled the sense of the miraculous around the dedication of the temple very sensitively. I also did not realize that when Joseph and Oliver were receiving the visitation of the Savior, Moses, Elijah, and Elias on the altar of the temple that up to 1,000 members were in the temple on the other side of the curtain. When I was growing up I did not understand clearly how early the Saints arrived in Missouri and how much larger the settlement there was than in Kirtland even though the temple in Kirtland was built and the proposed temple for Zion was not. Bushman also does a good job of giving a clear picture of the dynamics of the persecutions in Missouri and how the growing political power and anti-slavery stance of the Mormons antagonized the locals. The so-called Mormon War is also more critical to the rest of Joseph's life than I had realized. The constant hounding from Missouri and Joseph having to fear for his life from then on was something I had not truly appreciated. I also think Bushman handles the issue of plural marriage as well as it can be handled. And I think I gained a deeper understanding of John C. Bennett's role in the persecution of the Mormons in Illinois than I had before. I think the actual martyrdom is given a little too light a treatment here, but it is well covered material, and as Bushman notes, a great deal of faith promoting stories have accumulated around that event over the years. And I think he was probably wise in not opening up his book to attacks because he debunked someone's favorite story about Joseph's last days. Just laying out what is actually documented from the time is very helpful. Even with all the praise I have given, I could heap a great deal more if I had the space and time. But I do want to share an honest perspective I have of the book. It is superior, truly marvelous, from Joseph's early life through the dedication of the Kirtland Temple. That is the zenith of the book. From that point on, while good, the author himself cites difficulty in getting to Joseph directly after that point because his life and the nature of the work of the Church and the lives of the Saints changed. The rest of the book is not as exquisite. Very good, interesting, and informative, but not quite equal to the previous material. It becomes more of a narrative than it had been probably for the reason Bushman cites. I did find the footnotes and bibliography quite useful. They enriched my reading and sent me on to other reading I found illuminating and will help me in selecting other directions for study for years to come. So, I am especially thankful for the hard work in putting all that material together, as well. This is a monumental work and a treasure. Read it. Evaluate it for yourself no matter your present attitude or judgments of Joseph Smith. You will have a more considered and informed view for having read it. And, I don't know why this is in the paperback section. I bought and read the hardcover of the book. Reviewed by Craig Matteson, Saline, MI
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2012
R
Verified Purchase
R. Mckissick
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Candid Honesty from a great American Historian
Format: Hardcover
Reading Puritans to Yankees, a Bancroft Prize history, I moved to this tome. Professor(full) Bushman is a great American historian. This book follows tradition. One look at Prof. Bushman's on-line student sylabuses or awards at Columbia illustrates his leadership ofhistory students. Years I've spent trying to better understand ancient Pauls revelations; in particular the one with Christ on the road. How can one get closer to Christ without understanding revelation? At the third read of Rough Stone, and lots of redlines, I think this book is about revelation. Also what a rare thing revelation has been; heaven is open modernly for revelation. I wish I could understand the Bible without a guide to communicaton form God. Rough Stone has opened a new understanding of revelation. Maybe the most important thing is that God is all powerful and supreem, and will talk to us when He wants and we are able to understand. Bushman's honest facts include the unknown. Cited notes and end references indicate ratio of 20 to 1, focusing on issues not defense. His knowledge quest is aparent, like an intelligent friend who relates and lays out the reasons for his analysis. The evidence historians rely on, shows that Smith himself spoke and acted consistently with God. All true history I have read has good and bad - same here - the voice is one of personal knowledge. Whether or not you accept Bushman's conclusions on various issues, it is clear that Bushman himself has come historically to his conclusions. Very powerfull statement for an eminent historian. Dissecting a paragraph on prayer, washings and annointings leading up to the 1836 Kirtland Temple dedication is illustrative. After a summary, each person involved is organized into groups (priests, bishops presidents etc.). Concise background connects mental states. Bushman conveys the visions and revelations. Each hammered paragraph a razor sharp sword of truth, accompanied by the Spirit of Christ. May I someday write like this. This book does not attempt reader placement in contextual cultural affinity. The 1840's Latter-day Saints were persecuted, we are not. The Holocost Jews, read pogrom, are culturally atuned, and able to sympathize, we are not. Conveying instructions on getting revelation to unsympathetic readers like us was a challenge beyond comprehenson; study brings some understanding. Bushman has become sympathetic. His out-of-book descriptions of Lincoln defending on the Illinois circuit court clearly depict Bushmans cultural affinity. After three reads, I am becomming sympathetic. My wife calls me a bit crazy with the the 10 mile walks to Church, and baking bread from hand ground wheat, and almost loosing my job from sticking up for "no discussions of dating activities by the student interns at work". A good book should motivate action - maybe I should be less motivated (so she says). The highest recommendation, this is what I would give this book. I A guide to me, it sits with Bushmans other books and essays. I seem better able to understand conference talks. I listened to N. Eldon Tanners talk on Christ from the 147th conference (1982). He went over the first vision. But it became clear Tanner was talking from personal revelation, relating the 1832 description of Joseph Smith. Characteristics of revelation I learned reading Bushmans book jumped out at me during Tanners' talk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2011
R
Verified Purchase
R. C. Harris Jr.
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
"Clearly the definitive biogrophy for generations to come."
Format: Hardcover
I have read many books about Joseph Smith the prophet, but none have been so informative and balanced as this one. Some of what makes this so brilliant is the autor's choice to include as much information as possible - regardless of it's implications. Richard L. Bushman does not shy away from the controversial, presenting Joseph as somebody who I can finally relate to as a human being, rather than some kind of perfect "way up there" godlike being that Primary and Sunday School (intentionally or not) portray him. It was a relief for me to read of Joseph's mistakes in addition to his many amazing accomoplishments as a prophet, mayor, general, presidential candidate and much more. I love how honest Brother Bushman is in the book's preface: "A believing historian like myself cannot [...] pretend nothing personal is at stake. For a character as controversial as Smith, pure objectivity is impossible. What I can do is to look frankly at all the sides of Joseph Smith, facing up to his mistakes and flaws. Covering up errors makes no sense in any case. Most readers do not believe in, nor are they interested in, perfection. We want to meet a real person." Brother Bushman has "undertaken to explore a side of Joseph Smith not adequately examined in other biogrophies: his religious thought." Thus, we are able to peer into the mind and thoughts of the prophet - to a degree never before accomplished. What motivated him to make the choices he made? Why did he sometimes seem to "lie" in regards to poligamy, the danites, his political motivations, etc? Why was he so "secretive" of his past, the BOM translation, his early visions, etc? All of these and other questions are addressed and we are given a deeper understanding by peering into the mind and "religious thought" of the prophet. For those wondering how much of Brother Bushman's previous work 'Joseph Smith and the beginnings of Mormonism' is contained in this work, he answers that in the preface: "Large portions of chapters 1, 2, 3 and 5" are recycled in this book. I can't praise this book enough. I loved it so much that I bought a second copy to loan out to friends from church. (Yes, I am an active LDS.) I also bought a copy for my Dad for Christmas. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in a true and balanced history of Joseph Smith, the prophet. It is true that it shows "negative" sides to the prophet, but these are all very well documented and could not be ignored. I for one appreciate the inclusion of all the facts, not just the ones that place Joseph in a good light. It is as historian Terry L. Givens states on the back cover: "Clearly the definitive biogrophy for generations to come. The most balanced, thorough, and insightful treatment to date--truly a masterful work."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2005
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Houston, US
★★★★★ 4
Good material for seminary class or testimony meeting, questionable history and biography
Format: Hardcover
Bushman' preface tells us that this "biography" is a "believers" perspective on Joseph Smith's life and time. Thus, Bushman's book is valuable as insight into how devout, believing, practicing Mormons view Joseph's life. To me, as a "gentile", the book seems like great material for a seminary class or a testimony meeting. The basic Mormon "testimony" statement goes something like "I have a testimony of the truth of the Book of Mormon and that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God." I also imagine that this book might be good material for missionary training. But I have some problems with the historical scholarship. (See the end of my review.) Regardless of my problems with Bushman's text, Joseph Smith is an interesting and complicated character. He has had a lasting impact, and fathered a religion that has members around the world. His life, as well as the religion and church he founded, is well worth studying. But then the same could be said of Ellen White, L. Ron Hubbard, Mary Baker Eddy, and many others. Bushman does give us a valuable, well written (but at times tedious), insight into a believer's perspective on Joseph. But the value of this book as history and biography is problematic. When the historical evidence suggests conflicting interpretations, or negative interpretations, of Joseph, and exposes some of the "rough edges", Bushman never deviates from his testimony that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God. Consequently Bushman always seems to be able to smooth the edges of this "rough stone rolling". In doing so there are some misrepresentations and omissions which diminish the value of this book as a serious study of Joseph's life and times. Bushman has solved the biography problem for believing Mormons who have waited over 60 years for an alternative, and antidote, to Fawn Brodie's "No one Knows my History". But I don't think he has transcended Brodie's work. If you are not a believing Mormon, a better introduction to Joseph Smith would be Robert Remini's short biography (182 pages), "Joseph Smith". Then tackle Bushman's tome (561 pages of text). Problems with Bushmans text: 1. Bushman, as Mormon historians and General Authorities have done for over 100 years, misrepresents and distorts the perspective of Josiah Quincy. A century ago B. H. Roberts claimed that Quincy was "on our side". In the prologue (pp. 1-7), Bushman represents Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic". In fact Quincy saw Joseph and his religious movement as an "evil fanaticism" and likens Joseph to Thomas Muntzer (Mulhausen) and Jan van Leydon (Munster). This is clearly stated in the opening paragraph of Quincy's essay, along with comments about "demoralizing doctrines", "still darker revelations", and the assertion that Joseph's religion is "subversive of every duty which we claim from the citizen". ( For the significance of the references to Mulhausen and Munster see Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium, pp. 234-280 and Anthony Arthur, The Tailor-King). My concern is not with the merits of Quincy's essay. (You can read Quincy for yourself at [...]) Rather it is that Bushman's representation of Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic" is at best inaccurate. Quincy's puzzlement is of a very different nature than Bushman would have us believe. I think Quincy's statements might be closer to what Bushman call the "anti-Mormon argument" (p. 510). But Quincy's personal position on Joseph and his followers would be closer to Thomas Gregg's (p. 532). There are three other misrepresentations of Quincy. Towards the end of the book, Bushman quotes Quincy as saying the Nauvoo temple architecture is "odd and striking"(p. 504). But Quincy also said the temple was "grotesque"! In short he was not favorably impressed. On page 522 Bushman says "Quincy was surprised to hear Joseph invite a Methodist to preach from a Mormon pulpit." In Quincy's text the Methodist minister was clearly surprised at the invitation. But Quincy does not reveal his reaction to this invitation. Given Quincy's descriptions of the banter between Joseph and the minister, I think it would be more appropriate to say Quincy was at best amused. On page 560 Bushman says "Quincy saw in him `that kingly faculty that directs, as by intrinsic light." Bushman puts a period at the end of this quote when there should have been an ellipsis. The sentence concludes "the feeble or confused souls who are looking for guidance." Why did Bushman suggest that the sentence ended at "intrinsic light"? What was Quincy trying to say by this remark? Quincy clearly recognized Joseph as a natural and charismatic leader. While Quincy acknowledged Joseph's leadership strengths, this apparent compliment has to be tempered by the reference to "feeble or confused souls"? Also consider the Mulhausen and Munster references. I don't think that Quincy was in awe of Joseph, or impressed with Joseph in a positive way. Yet in the paragraph that contains this quote, Bushman is expressing his own sense of awe and marvel at Joseph's life and accomplishments. Bushman is entitled to his view of Joseph. But I don't think he is entitled to suggest that Quincy shared his view. 2. Bushman's discussion of the "View of the Hebrews" as a source for Joseph's writing the Book of Mormon (p. 96), fails to cite B. H. Roberts' extended essay documenting similarities between the two books. My concern is not with the merits of Roberts essay. The problem is that Bushman completely ignores Roberts essay in discussing this topic, as well as Roberts essay on archeological evidence for the Book of Mormon. (p. 92) (Roberts essays are published by Signature Books: "Studies of the Book of Mormon", 1985, [...]) I could cite more problems but I would greatly exceed what I think is the appropriate length for an Amazon review.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2006

recommand products