SKU: 65358202232
sage house plant

sage house plant White Sage Plants ‘Salvia apiana’

Sale price$24.78 Regular price$27.53
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.88 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 22 - Jul 27

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

sage house plant White Sage Plants ‘Salvia apiana’The white sage plant, known as Salvia apiana, is a fragrant evergreen shrub popular in gardens for drought tolerant, or low maintenance landscapes. This Salvia apiana reflects the white to silver appearance of its elliptical leaves. It has several other common names such as Sacred Sage, or bee sage. The plants unique scent, which is both pungent and sweet, is a defining feature, and is often grown in herb gardens, medicinal plant collections, and

The white sage plant, known as Salvia apiana, is a fragrant evergreen shrub popular in gardens for drought-tolerant, or low-maintenance landscapes. This Salvia apiana reflects the white-to-silver appearance of its elliptical leaves.  

It has several other common names such as Sacred Sage, or bee sage. The plant’s unique scent, which is both pungent and sweet, is a defining feature, and is often grown in herb gardens, medicinal plant collections, and ornamental spaces for its aesthetic appeal and cultural value.

It is most commonly used in Native American rituals for ceremonial smudging and cleansing. White sage is often bundled into smudge sticks for these rituals, which are deeply rooted in Indigenous practices.

This California white sage is renowned for its historical and cultural significance. The only region where white sage naturally occurs are Southern California and Northern Baja.  It holds significant cultural value for the Indigenous communities in these areas.

The White Sage typically can grow up to 5 feet tall and wide.

The silvery-white foliage gives the plant its characteristic look, with leaves that are slightly furry to the touch, adding a soft texture to the landscape.

Its upright, woody stems support this compact structure, making it ideal for borders, drought-tolerant gardens, focal points for water-wise gardens, or as a specimen plant in a xeriscape design. This sage plant is also reflective of the moon and night lighting.

The white sage plant blooms in late spring to summer, with white to pale lavender flowers. The white sage flower stalks can reach up to 6 feet in height. These delicate blooms not only enhance the plant’s ornamental value but also provide a vital food source for a variety of pollinators.  

When and How to Water Your White Sage Plant 

Native to arid regions, these white sage plants are adapted to drought conditions, so they prefer infrequent watering. When watering your sage plant, it's essential to mimic its natural habitat by allowing the soil to dry out between waterings. Overwatering can lead to root rot and other issues, so it's crucial to strike a balance. 

In the spring and summer, during the growing season, you can water your Salvia apiana more frequently, but always check the soil moisture level before watering. A good practice is to water deeply but less frequently to encourage the plant's roots to grow deeper into the soil. In contrast, during the winter months or dormant periods, reduce watering to prevent waterlogged soil, which can harm the plant. 

Observing your Salvia apiana plant for signs of wilting or drooping can also indicate when it needs water. Remember, it's better to underwater than overwater white sage plants. By understanding and meeting the watering needs of your Salvia apiana, you can help it thrive and enjoy its aromatic foliage and beautiful white flowers. 

Light Requirements – Where to Put White Sage

When grown indoors, it's crucial to place your white sage plant in a location that receives plenty of bright, indirect sunlight for at least 4-6 hours. A south-facing window is ideal for indoor Salvia apiana, as it can get the sunlight it needs without being exposed to direct harsh rays that could scorch its leaves. Rotate the plant occasionally to ensure all sides receive adequate light for even growth.

For outdoor cultivation, white sage plants thrive in full sun conditions. They require at least 6 to 8 hours of direct sunlight daily to grow vigorously and produce their aromatic leaves and flowers.

Ensure no large trees or structures shade the plant during the day. It is well-suited to arid and sunny climates, making it an excellent choice for gardens in regions with plenty of sunlight. 

By providing the right amount of light, whether indoors near a sunny window or outdoors in a full-sun location, you can help your plant flourish and maintain its health and vitality.

Remember to adjust the plant's position as needed to ensure it receives adequate sunlight for robust growth and abundant foliage.

Optimal Soil & Fertilizer Needs

White sage prefers well-draining soil with a sandy or gravelly texture, mimicking its natural arid habitat. Planting them in ordinary soil will result in compacted roots, stunted growth, and most likely root rot.  A well-drained potting mix works well for container-grown plants, ensuring excess water can easily drain away to prevent root rot. Instead, make or buy a well-draining potting mix, or ideally use our Go to soil-cactus-mix-blend-1-gal-4-qt-cacti-succulent-dirt-compost-growing-media that contains 5 natural substrates and mycorrhizae to promote the development of a strong root system that helps your plant to thrive. 

In terms of fertilization, white sage is a low-maintenance plant that doesn't require frequent feeding. A light application of a balanced fertilizer, such as a 10-10-10 formula, in the spring as new growth begins can help provide the necessary nutrients for the plant's development. Avoid over-fertilizing, as this can lead to excessive foliage growth at the expense of the plant's aromatic qualities. 

Organic fertilizers, such as compost or well-aged manure, can also be beneficial for California white sage plants. These natural fertilizers provide a slow release of nutrients that can support the plant's growth without the risk of chemical buildup in the soil. By selecting the right soil type and using a balanced fertilizer sparingly, you can help your plant thrive and maintain its unique fragrance and appearance. 

Hardiness Zone & More

When grown indoors, white sage prefers a warm and dry environment similar to its native habitat. Maintain indoor temperatures around 60-75°F during the day and slightly cooler at night. Avoid placing the plant near drafts or heating vents that can create temperature fluctuations, which may stress the plant. 

For outdoor cultivation, white sage is well-suited to regions with warm to hot climates. It is typically recommended for USDA hardiness zones 9-11, where temperatures remain above freezing throughout the year. It can tolerate temperatures down to approximately 20°F, but prolonged exposure to frost can damage the plant. In terms of humidity, it thrives in low-humidity environments, making it an excellent choice for arid or semi-arid regions where humidity levels are naturally low. 

This traditional method of drying white sage leaves helps to preserve their aroma and medicinal properties. Once the leaves are completely dry, they can be used for smudging rituals or for making herbal teas. 

Wildlife - White Sage Plant attracts the following Friendly-Pollinators

White Sage flowers are particularly loved for their ability to attract pollinators, especially native bees like the California bumblebee or carpenter bees. The abundance of nectar in its flowers serves as a food source for various pollinators, contributing to the health of the surrounding ecosystem. In addition to bees, the plant is frequently visited by hummingbirds and butterflies, adding a dynamic element to any garden. 

Butterflies
Bees
Hummingbirds
Lady Bugs
Multi Pollinators
Other Birds

Toxicity: As for toxicity, White Sage is generally non-toxic to humans, pets, and livestock. It is safe for use in herbal preparations and ceremonies, and there are no significant risks of toxicity for dogs, cats, or birds. However, as with any plant, it’s essential to ensure that pets don’t consume large quantities, as excessive ingestion of any plant material may cause minor gastrointestinal discomfort in sensitive animals.

Propagating White Sage Plant

To propagate white sage plants, you can use both seeds and stem cuttings. When propagating from Salvia apiana seeds, start by collecting mature seeds from the plant and sowing them in a well-draining soil mix in early spring. Keep the soil consistently moist but not waterlogged until the seeds germinate. For stem cuttings, take a 4-6 inch cutting from a healthy Salvia plant, remove the lower leaves, and place the cutting in a pot with a mix of perlite and peat moss. Keep the soil lightly moist and provide indirect light until roots develop. With proper care and attention, you can successfully propagate Salvia apiana plants to expand your garden or share with others. 

Key Takeaways 

  1. It is most commonly used in Native American rituals for ceremonial smudging and cleansing.
  2. White Sage (Salvia apiana) is a hardy, aromatic shrub with striking silvery foliage and fragrant leaves.
  3. Known for its cultural significance and ability to thrive in dry, arid conditions.
  4. Perfect for low-maintenance, drought-tolerant gardens.
  5. It reaches a mature size of 5 feet, with upright growth and tall spikes of pale lavender flowers.
  6. Requires full sun, well-drained soil, and minimal watering once established.
  7. Ideal for xeriscaping due to its drought tolerance.
  8. It attracts pollinators and is non-toxic, making it versatile for both ornamental and practical uses.
  9. A standout addition to your garden—order your white sage plant for sale today!
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 65358202232

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell sage house plant

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
U
UJ
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Comprehensive, invaluable resource
Format: Hardcover, Format: Hardcover
This set is just massive. There is so much depth and insight, I don't know that I'll ever get to it all. One could literally read these volumes cover to cover because they're simply interesting and thought provoking. That said, I think it's best taken in small doses, perhaps focusing on single verses as they arise in daily life or in bible study. The physical quality of the volumes is top notch as well. This set would work well in a private library but could be equally appropriate for a church library. Absolutely recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2025
P
Peter P
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Valued study tool
Format: Hardcover
This resource is phenomenal. I’ve been including this commentary set in my resources to teach through the minor prophets, and I find myself really appreciating its solid, accurate, grace-filled contents. This includes the ESV text, supporting timelines, graphics, and charts, and expansive commentary supporting the text. This set will be a valued study tool for years to come.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
A
Andrew D. Lossing
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Imposing and Exceptional Quality
Format: Hardcover
The content and quality of the ESV commentary series matches that of their study Bibles. Broadly reformed, but not dogmatic on a particular angle, clear and concise, great for study. This commentary set isn't so much for digging deep in the weeds as it is for learning a solid Biblical Theology-based framework of the Bible. It's simpler than some, but much more in-depth than the ESV Study Bible, making it the next step for learning. The full set is imposing - lovely big, black hardbacks which look phenomenal on a bookshelf. Do I think this is practical for everybody? No, it might not be. You can get this kind of thing in digital form in one way or another these days (please understand that I don't like to go quite that digital, and I haven't researched what all is available). If you're pressed for living space, you might not want these. I live with a spouse in a midsize one-bedroom apartment. Fortunately, we already knew we wanted to prioritize some of our space for physical books, because we find pleasure in them. I will have to clear off some of my existing bookshelf space and relegate some books to a box in storage (consider that this set takes up all the space in a fairly large packing box, and you'll know how much you need). But it's worth it for me. I also see the acquisition of this box set as a bit of a prompt to take back up more in-depth study of the Scripture, which too often gets sidetracked by the rest of life getting in the way. Having the physical books are already something of a commitment. If all I had were ebooks or an app, I would likely never utilize them the same way. Last notes: these were packed very well. Each volume is shrink-wrapped in cellophane and none of the corners were damaged. They did a good job with that. Lastly, the price for these is fairly high. I acknowledge that. I think theological books are about on the same level, usually, however. So I did not see the need to deduct a star.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2025
P
Verified Purchase
Patrick S.
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
A fun and fulfilling book - would love to own the series
Format: Paperback
I had a lot of fun with this book. About a year ago, I really came down on the side of presuppositionalism and have studied the approach, see if it was useful against two of the leading atheistic books (God Is Not Great and The God Delusion), and now I wanted to match it up against four other views of apologetics. I will try to not go into too much detail here as I think the book is an important read for developing an apologetic standpoint. The book follows the 1)"model of Approach X is presented" then 2) "Response from other 4 approaches to counter Approach X" and then move on to the next approach. The book allows final statements from each writer for a final opportunity. Steven Cowan has a good introduction and epilogue that bookends the book well. Craig (Classical Approach) really surprised me as he brings in the role of the Holy Spirit early into the conversation. I really thought I was going to just be reading the finer points of the Kalam argument he's known for. The role of the Holy Spirit is reflected in the other authors' approaches as well and that was nice to see. It's also nice to see Craig debating with Christians for once and it's here that you really get to see his thought process contrasting with other people with the same worldview. There are issues that Craig tries to bring up against the presuppositionist view point that could be applied for him. He doesn't seem to get that all foundations are, by definition, circular because if you can appeal to something more foundational, then your foundation isn't your foundation at all. Craig seems to bring in some higher concepts about probability to make some of his points and I think that's really a miss for anyone who's not a high level philosopher (and even some philosophers might have issues understand what he's talking about here). Habermas (Evidential Approach) seems to have an undue hatred for presuppositionalism. He's also another person who doesn't realize that the approach he uses isn't really the foundation he is starting from. I think he resents doing the hard work that the other approaches then build up to. Feinberg (Cumulative Case Approach) seems to miss the point of presuppositionalism entirely. He's got the approach of what I call the "shotgun approach" in the sense that he wants to use everything possible and sees what he hits. Frame (Presuppostional Approach) does an ok job with presenting the method. I don't think he would be my first choice in representing the approach. He doesn't do a good job of explaining the "problem of circularity" isn't a problem. He just does an "ok" job. Clark (Reformed Epistemological Approach) is one I was excited to read. I liked some of his points he made when talking about the other approaches. Then I read his approach and was extremely disappointed. The biggest flaw is that he states literally that his approach doesn't help to show the Christian God is real. I would say then your apologetic method is worthless and not a real method at all. I understand the R.E. approach but if I went only with Clark's explanation and argumentation, I wouldn't have even considered it a real area of focus. The book is well laid out, the footnotes are at the bottom of the pages (SO helpful!), Cowan does a good job of wrangling the writers and offering expanded reading and other authors for each area of focus. Myself and my mentor spent from January to August every other week going over and discussing the book. Finding flaws, comparing and contrasting, and seeing where points were made and where points were missed. I think the biggest deficit we found was that the writers tended to assume agreement on definitions of words that played a big role (for example - the word "evidence" NEEDED to be defined right off the bat by every author and it wasn't until Frame in his response to the objections raised did we even have one person define it). My suggestion for this book to maximize the fun is to pick a method and try and defend that method throughout; even with the writer arguing your side. My book is filled with notes and highlights that just made this book a great enjoyment to meet and discuss with a fellow Believer about. It does not settle all the issues, but it does help you focus on the fact that we still aren't done learning yet. Final Grade - A-
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2013
L
Verified Purchase
Lyndon Unger
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 4
Great Introduction to the Various Schools of Apologetics
Format: Paperback
In reading "Five Views on Apologetics", I first had to wonder why the book was called "Five Views" and not "Three Views", since the first three authors admittedly had so much in common with each other that it seemed that their positions were subcategories of a singular system of apologetics. In fact, Habermas claimed Craig as an evidentialist on multiple occasions and admitted they had relatively minor disagreements. Feinberg was also an evidentialist, but he differed from Habermas and Craig in supposing that any one argument could possibly be persuasive to a skeptic. All three individuals definitely agreed on so much though that their three essays proved to be slightly disappointing as in the end, I figured that any one of them practically utilized a combination of all three approaches (I've heard Craig make cumulative case presentations...). I wondered exactly why they were representing different apologetic camps. Don't get me wrong: I like Craig and Hambermas and Feinberg; they're brothers in the Lord. I just find that evidentialism's off-shoots are so similar to each other that taking three chapters for the various forms of evidentialism didn't seem that worthwhile. Ironically, it seemed that the other two views of were related by what seemed like a mutual distaste for the other, Frame wrote that he "was rather disappointed at Clark's treatment of the role of the Bible in determining apologetic principles" (310) and the suggestion that Clark might not have "tried hard enough to find out what the Bible says" (310) also seemed like a needless jab, but Frame still commended Clark on plenty and suggested that "presuppositionalists too are Reformed epistemologists" (312). On the other hand, Clark wrote that Frame's essay is "the best version of presuppositionalism I have ever read" but then went on to suggest that presuppositionalism (at least as presented by Van Til) was either too confusing for him or was "obviously false" (255). Clark parroted the often repeated gross misunderstanding of presuppositionalism that "non-christians cannot know anything" (256), suggested that Frame implied this concept (257) and then spent several paragraphs refuting an obviously silly postulate; it's strange how Clark would insinuate that Frame would be so plainly stupid and I got the idea that Clark thought that all presuppositional apologists were somehow mentally lacking. Even in my early reading of Van Til, I understood that he was writing about how unbelievers cannot account for how they know anything, not whether or not they can know anything. What was even more alarming was Clarks' confession that "anyone can find some support for his or her position in Scripture" (275), as if scripture lacks a clear meaning and is somehow malleable enough to consistently conform to anyone's presuppositions. I was left dissatisfied by how Clark didn't seem to exhibit reformed theology and I was also puzzled why Frame didn't present the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (the main positive argument of presuppositionalism). What was even more humerous was how Craig presented a fairly solid version of the transcendental argument and gave Frame a slight poke for not presenting the "main course" of presuppositionalism. On the whole, I found "Five Views" to be reflective of much of my general feelings of the current state of apologetics; too distracted, too unscriptural, and too confusing. It was a difficult read at times; William Lane Craig's constant scampering into symbolic logic was frustrating and made me wonder whether the publisher clearly communicated the target audience to the authors. I was disappointed that none of the authors attempted to establish any component of their case from scriptural exegesis but instead presented philosophical constructs aided by proof texts (i.e. Habermas referenced Romans 8:16 on page 97 as `proof' that the Holy Spirit may work through apologetics to bring "full assurance to believers", arguably not the meaning of Romans 8:16). I also found myself wondering if the authors were agreeing on theological points due to lack of clarity (i.e. Craig's writing about the inner witness of the Holy Spirit was general enough that it sounded Mormon...). The book was good, and it DID expose me to five (arguably) different apologetic systems, but I hesitate to give it 5 stars due to some of the weak/unclear presentations of the systems and the thought that this isn't the best that evangelicalism has to offer. It's still a worthwhile buy and I'm likely being too hard on it. I'd recommend it as an intro book for a college level Apologetics class, or for someone who's already familiar with theology and the concept of apologetics but isn't familiar with it in depth.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2009

recommand products