SKU: 68902310715
heusinkveld sprint clutch pedal

heusinkveld sprint clutch pedal Heusinkveld Sprint 3-Pedal Set

$22.79 $25.32
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on virtipatel.com >

Pay in installments of $6.33 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 29 - Sep 3

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

heusinkveld sprint clutch pedal Heusinkveld Sprint 3-Pedal SetWant to improve your lap times and race with more consistency? The Sprint pedals are perfect for you! A strong, accurate, and customizable pedal set designed to elevate your race pace. If youre looking for pedals that help you to be both quick and consistent, look no further. FEATURES Strong, Compact & Adjustable A perfect choice for both casual simracers and professional Esports drivers Unmatched Accuracy Not all load cell pedals are equal. Sprint

Want to improve your lap times and race with more consistency? The Sprint pedals are perfect for you! A strong, accurate, and customizable pedal set designed to elevate your race pace. If you’re looking for pedals that help you to be both quick and consistent, look no further. 

 

FEATURES

Strong, Compact & Adjustable
A perfect choice for both casual simracers and professional Esports drivers

 

Unmatched Accuracy
Not all load cell pedals are equal. Sprint pedals have properly implemented load sensors based on mathematical design models. So you can rely on a true 1-on-1 relation between your driving inputs and the pedal output to the simulator.

 

Optimize Your Setup
Sprint pedals offer a wide range of adjustability options. Soft or stiff pedals, long or short travel, low or high forces, it’s your choice.

 

Gain a Competitive Control
Every tenth of a second counts. Heusinkveld Sprint pedals offer a realistic feeling, which enables you to improve your driving style and become more consistent and faster each lap. Fine tune your brake feeling through varying with the 6 different brake firmness choices.

 

Be in Control with SmartControl
With our SmartControl software you can easily configure deadzones, brake force and customize pedal output curves. You can even change key settings while driving.

 

Compact & Easy to Install
Made out of robust laser cut steel, Sprint pedals are able to handle high forces in a compact design. This makes Sprint pedals easy to mount in any simulator.

 

 

ABOUT THE SPRINT PEDALS

Overview
Heusinkveld Sprint are strong & highly adjustable, with 6 different brake settings. They are the perfect pedals for home-use simulators, to improve your consistency and become a quicker simracer.

Sprint pedals offer a highly customizable experience, allowing you to fine-tune your setup for the perfect balance of feel and responsiveness. With advanced load cell braking, smooth pedal travel, and robust durability, the Sprint pedals are built to withstand intense racing sessions. Whether you’re aiming for consistency or maximum performance, Heusinkveld Sprint pedals offer the reliability and precision that can take your racing to the next level.

The Heusinkveld Sprint pedals offer an incredibly responsive and precise feel, with each pedal delivering a smooth and consistent action. The brake pedal provides a solid, firm resistance that mimics the real-world sensation of braking, offering a high level of control and feedback. Sprint pedals help to elevate your skills and push your sim racing to new heights.

Mathematical models were developed to calculate pedal movement and the required force, accurately predicting how each pedal will perform in any configuration. Design tolerances have been fine-tuned to minimize play in every pedal. They are insensitive to dust and dirt and do not wear out, resulting in unmatched accuracy and durability over time. All critical pivot points feature slide bearings and have undergone automated durability tests to ensure reliable performance after one million cycles.

 

Adjustment Options
Each pedal has different adjustment options but some adjustments are for

Pedals:

    • Pedal angle
    • Pedal plate height

Throttle:

    • 5 pedal travel settings
    • Overall pedal force
    • Pedal spring preload

The throttle pedal gives you excellent control over any car and you’ll be able to set it up exactly to your liking.

Brake:

    • Pedal stiffness. The brake pedal has a dual stage brake system and 6 resistance settings regarding firmness.
    • Coil spring preload

Clutch:

    • Pedal force
    • Pedal spring preload

The clutch pedal features a regressive spring mechanism, which simulates a typical concave clutch curve.

Software:

    • Maximum brake force
    • Output curves
    • Deadzones

 

Components
The Heusinkveld Sprint 3-pedal set consists of a clutch, throttle and brake pedal.

 

Mounting
Each pedal is equipped with four mounting slots, allowing forwards and backwards adjustments to be made for optimal ergonomics. Because the Sprint pedals can handle relatively high operating forces (up to 65kg at the brake pedal), you must install the pedals on a very rigid base.

Possible mounting solutions are aluminum profile beams, a thick metal (drilled) plate or our Sprint Baseplate.

The following mounting materials are included:

  • 12x M5x12mm bolts
  • 12x M5x20mm bolts
  • 12x M5 washer
  • 12x M5 flanged nut


Electronics
The all new electronics have been integrated in the brake pedal. This allows for a clean setup with a minimum of wire clutter.

The controller board has received a conformal coating in order to shield it from moisture and dust. The product as a whole is CE certified and has been tested to be compliant with all applicable European EMC norms and regulations.

 

 

SPECIFICATIONS

Compatibility PC (Windows 10 or newer)
Software SmartControl & SmartControl Live
Controller Yes, integrated in the brake pedal
Plug and play Yes
Max Actual Braking Force 65 kg
Dimensions 363x222x90mm
Material Powder coated and glass bead blasted stainless steel
Weight 4.05 kg
Sensor type Force-sensitive 120kg load cell (brake pedal)
Position-sensitive load cell (throttle & clutch)
Packaging Eco-Friendly Packaging
Warranty 2 years
Certificate EMC + CE
Suitable for Esports, home use
Type of cars F1 (realistic brake force), GP2, F3, Indycar, LMP, GT cars, Nascar, Rally, Road cars
Adjustments/settings 6 brake resistance settings, pedal preload, pedal angle, pedal travel,
pedal plate height, pedal output curves, deadzones
Mounting On a full frame rig (you can use the optional Sprint Baseplate)

 

 

WARRANTY

Heusinkveld gives a 24-month warranty starting from the date of delivery. Repairs and/or replacement deliveries do not create an extension of the warranty period. The warranty means that defects will be remedied free of charge within a reasonable period of time, either by repairing or replacing the products and/or parts in question. The products and/or parts replaced become the property of Heusinkveld. The warranty does not include any further right to compensation from Heusinkveld. The warranty does not cover defects resulting from:

  • a. incorrect setup and/or installation;
  • b. non-compliance with the (safety) regulations stated in the manual;
  • c. inappropriate use;
  • d. inappropriate operation;
  • e. external influences, such as transport damage and impact damage;
  • f. repairs and modifications not carried out by Heusinkveld;
  • g. use of non-original parts. Heusinkveld does not warrant that the products are suitable for the purpose for which the Buyer wishes to use them. Under no circumstances are the products suitable for use other than in a simulator.

The products are not suitable for use on (public) roads, on a test track, or as (part of) an electric vehicle.

    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 68902310715

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell heusinkveld sprint clutch pedal

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.3 ★★★★★
    Based on 30 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    C
    Verified Purchase
    Connie Jones
    Chelsea, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Transcends the Historiography on the Constitution
    Format: Hardcover
    “This is the most important book to be written on the Constitution since Gordon Wood’s Creation.”
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2020
    M
    moxielady
    Houston, US
    ★★★★★ 2
    I Really Wanted to Like This, But...
    Format: Audiobook
    My 2 star review is entirely due to the audio performance. While the premise and scholarly research in this book is fascinating, the narration is anything but. The narrator speaks, and at times even PERFORMS, every "quote" and "unquote" no matter where they are in the text. In a long (20 hours) book relying heavily on quotations, this narrative choice dramatically detracts from the listener's ability to absorb the material. One wonders why he doesn't say, "period," after every sentence! In addition, he sounds like he's spraying a lot of spit at the mike while speaking. Yes, euw. I listen to 3-8 audiobooks a week, and have done so since the early 1990s, so this isn't my first, or even my first scholarly, audiobook. The better narrators designate quoted text with a shift in vocal tone or slight pause. If you are considering this book, I hope you choose the print version.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2021
    A
    [email protected]
    Grantham, US
    ★★★★★ 3
    Good to excellent content - terrible publishing policy
    Format: Hardcover
    Lewis (Not "Flewis") wrote a decent text a number of years ago. It was then expanded to a companion volume (Analytical Sedimentology) with another author. The two nicely complement each other but the mind boggles at a price of almost $100 per each. The publisher has clearly made little effort to control the cost. Redundancy between the two volumes is excessive, hard cover rather than soft is used and, indeed, both could easily have been combined in one less pricey volume. A valuable resource to students and professionals has therefore been compromised by publisher, author or both due to ignorance, greed or stupidity. A terrible shame!
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 1998
    J
    Verified Purchase
    JMB1014
    Whiting, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    An Excellent Introduction to Legal and Constitutional Reasoning
    Format: Hardcover
    This is an excellent introductory volume for people who feel confused by the debate over "original intent" versus a "living Constitution." David A. Strauss is a law professor at the University of Chicago. His book is a quick read (139 pages), with no notes, bibliography or other impedimenta - just an index. It's a very lucid explanation of legal reasoning and how the Supreme Court has followed this basic process over time. Hence the "living constitution" is really just an instance of the English common law tradition functioning normally. This book will teach many Americans how legal reasoning actually operates in practice. It is a common-sensical and conservative process that seeks at once to promote predictability and fairness. By and large, it has worked well. The phrase "living Constitution" has been denigrated by people who seek to turn back the calendar to a day when more "traditional" values were imposed by law. In so doing, they have invoked an historical fiction, the "original intent" of the framers of the Constitution. The myriad problems arising from this effort, if not its disingenuousness, have been discussed with insight and erudition by such excellent minds as Jack Rakove ("Original Meanings")and Akhil Reed Amar ("The Bill of Rights," and "The American Constitution: A Biography"), to name just two. The real point of this book, I think, is to explain basic legal reasoning to a mass audience. This does a great service. It also shows how naturally the common law evolves, how it tends to restrain judicial activism and yet to permit flexibility as times and circumstances change. As Dean Roscoe Pound of the Harvard Law School put it in his book, "The Spirit of the Common Law," the common law is "essentially a mode of judicial and juristic thinking, a mode of treating legal problems rather than a fixed body of definite rules...." This is a critical distinction. Some so-called conservatives insist that judges must simply apply the law like automatons, as if it were a "fixed body of definite rules." They then seek to enlist the founding fathers in declaring what those rules are, or how definite they must be. But as Dean Pound and centuries of legal history demonstrate, this notion is far removed from the truth, and remote from any useful notion of adjudication. All Anglophone law schools, lawyers and judges are engaged in the process Dean Pound discusses. The common law tradition arose in England over the course of centuries. We imported it to this country in part because it was workable and practical, and because it was brilliantly and systematically expounded by Chief Justice Edward Coke in the 17th century and by Lord William Blackstone shortly before the American Revolution. No one would suggest that the common law tradition means the law is the captive of judges' subjective whims. Such an assertion would have sounded ludicrous to the English as well as to the founders. But as Strauss - and volumes of legal history - unsurprisingly demonstrate, the common law tradition is the key to constitutional interpretation. The common law is an inherently conservative instrument. It evolves incrementally. Those who complain about the "living Constitution" argue that judges merely rule according to their subjective prejudices. They contend that it is the legislative branch that should be charged with interpreting the Constitution. Of course, all three branches of government must interpret the Constitution from time to time. But the legislative branch should not have the last word in determining whether its own enactments meet constitutional scrutiny: To borrow from Chief Justice Coke, no one (including the legislature) may be the judge of his own cause. The function of determining whether legislation conforms to the Constitution has been and still is wisely confided to the courts, which by virtue of centuries of practice (as reflected in published opinions) have substantial expertise in the area and are independent. One also hears complaints that judges are insulated from reality. But courts are not insulated - they are independent. And they are independent precisely so they are not subject to being influenced by lobbyists or terrified by a challenger in a primary election. To show how the common law works, Strauss discusses the evolution of constitutional thought in relation to two major issues: freedom of speech and segregation in public schools. He explains how the "clear and present danger" test in freedom of speech cases evolved, implicating not just such considerations as the threat of imminent harm, but also that some kinds of speech have lower societal value (libel, obscenity, fighting words), while other kinds of speech have more societal value (great literature, political speech). Strauss goes on to discuss how Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was far less a radical overturning of an entrenched precedent, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), than a logical step in the development of the law. In so doing, he uses an example from the law of torts, where customers injured by dangerous products originally were barred from suing the manufacturer unless they had a contractual relationship with it. At first, the fact that a product was inherently dangerous overcame the requirement of a contractual relationship. As it became harder to draw a line between ordinary products and those that were inherently dangerous, however, the old requirement of a contractual relationship was found to have outworn its purpose and customers were permitted to sue the manufacturer who had created a foreseeable risk of harm. Thus, in products liability cases, as in racial equality cases, the law evolved to meet the new demands posed by changed circumstances. Strauss shows the development of the law by discussing cases on racial equality decided after Plessy that gradually undercut the Plessy decision until it was no longer tenable. Strauss does what law professors do every day: teach the law by showing how it evolved. His explanation, however, is so concise and clear that it makes the discussion seem not just sensible but compelling. Thus we see that the law works. As Strauss points out, we never wrangle over some constitutional issues because they are cut and dried (you have to be 30 years old to be a senator) or because certainty is required (January 20 is the day the new president takes office, no matter how unstable the current domestic or world situation). Other provisions require more effort to interpret, but this is because the founders brilliantly provided that some matters could be spelled out specifically in advance, while others would have to be expressed in more general terms, which could be adjusted to changing needs and times (e.g., the "necessary and proper" clause in Article I, Sec. 8). Interestingly, Strauss does not consider amendments to the Constitution to be part of what makes it a living document, since the amendment process is so onerous, slow, and seldom used. He points out how some amendments merely ratified the status quo, or served to clean up outliers, resolved technical issues, or were ahead of their time. As he offers these judgments, which seem balanced and reasonable, he also explains some of the less familiar amendments in a way that will have readers raising their eyebrows and saying "Oh, so that's where that came from." At the outset of the book, Strauss sets out three objections to originalism: That it is often, as a practical matter, impossible even for professional historians to discover what the intentions were of various founders with respect to matters discussed in the Constitution. That even if an intent of the founders could be discovered, it would pertain to the understanding they had about their world: how does one go about trying to fit that understanding to our world? That as Thomas Jefferson pointed out, one generation is to another as one sovereign nation is to another. The world belongs to the living. The notions of people long dead cannot bind us in the present or future. Strauss correctly observes that the third of these objections is by itself fatal to originalism. The founders were not so impressed with themselves that they felt their "intentions" should be forever imposed on posterity. Had they been dedicated to such a dubious project, they would surely have done a better job of documenting their debates and compromises during the Philadelphia convention. But little remains of those deliberations aside from the notes kept by James Madison. The Constitution, moreover, reflects their understanding that the future could not be shackled forever to the time in which they lived. They realized that the slave trade, for example, would prove intolerable and therefore provided that it could be abolished by at least 1808. So was their "original intent" to permit the slave trade, or was it that the slave trade should be abolished? And what does this say, if anything, about their intentions toward the institution of slavery - a word that did not even appear in the Constitution until the Thirteenth Amendment was adopted in 1865? Most damning of all to the originalist position is what Thomas Jefferson said on the subject. In a letter dated July 12, 1816, to Samuel Kercheval, Jefferson wrote "Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it, and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present, but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves, were they to rise from the dead. I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors." He added, "Let us follow no such examples nor weakly believe that one generation is not as capable as another of taking care of itself, and of ordering its own affairs." He even called for revision of the constitution at stated periods. While originalists would love to claim Jefferson as one of their own, his words - and indeed his whole life - prove that he was completely at odds with their approach. Men like Jefferson and Franklin, who were devotees of science, were fascinated by the progress men could make in trying to understand and improve their lives. Jefferson was an eager student of nature and did considerable experimentation with crops on his plantation. He famously wrote his "Notes on the State of Virginia" to refute the widely read claims of the French naturalist Buffon about the supposedly weak, degenerate, and insipid life forms to be found in the New World. The idea that such men, who were committed to the growth of knowledge, would seek to confine all future generations to the limited understanding they possessed of the universe in 1787, is worse than laughable. It can only be explained by the polemical purposes of those whose arguments for a regressive social order are so feeble that they have to seek refuge behind an imaginary "original intent" that they erect - as if the founders wanted their limited knowledge and often unarticulated, conflicting, or ambivalent intentions to restrict the great national experiment forever. Given the explicit language of Thomas Jefferson, quoted above, it is apparent that "originalism" actually belies and defies the express intent of Jefferson, one of the most eminent of the founders. It seems paradoxical but it was his original intent that his original intent should not govern future generations! Original intent also appears anomalously restrictive when one considers that the founders never contemplated the existence of an Air Force, though they expressly provided for the Army and the Navy. And ask an originalist what the original intent was with respect to the Second Amendment's use of the term "arms." The founders had no concept of assault rifles or machine guns, let alone nerve gas, laser-guided bombs, predator drones, or nuclear weapons. How do we impose an intention on them to assert what they could not have foreseen, namely, that ordinary householders in the 21st century should have a personal, constitutional right to be able to obliterate a small army in a matter of seconds, based on the founders' notions about the 18th century saber, musket or pistol? Likewise, the Eleventh Amendment says nothing to prohibit a person from suing her own state - just other states. Yet even "textualists" read an unwritten provision into the Eleventh Amendment because it suits their view of how "sovereign" the states should be. When given this kind of a taste of their own medicine, originalists collapse in helpless sputtering and exasperation. Exposed to Strauss' very sensible discussion, the concerns of originalists reflect opportunism and disingenuousness. After all, we should not expect lawyers and judges to become armchair historians, especially under the time pressures of litigation and in the face of hotly contested issues. We should not pretend the founders had some monolithic intent, least of all with respect to matters of which they had no concept. And as Jefferson pointed out, the relationship of one generation to another is like that of one sovereign nation to another: we cannot expect to bind future generations by the intentions of people who are long since dead. In short, there will always be those who resist change and those who welcome it. If you really want to see "judicial activism" at work, you will not find much of it in the common law tradition. A far better example is the recent decision - by the so-called conservatives on the Supreme Court - in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2010
    B
    Verified Purchase
    Benjamin Douglass
    Omaha, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    An Excellent Read
    Format: Kindle
    The author talks about our constitution as a "living document" and expertly draws the distinction between this and the originalist interpretation as a "dead document."
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2018

    recommand products

    SRAM X1 Schalthebel | 11-fach | schwarz
    24.33
    Pinarello Rennradrahmen Vuelta 56cm NOS New Old Stock blau
    24.45
    SRAM Rival Kurbel 1x12-fach DUB Wide | 170 mm | Kettenblatt 40 Zähne
    24.66
    Schalthebel TIAGRA für flache Lenker SL-4700 - rechts
    22.14
    SRAM Rival Kurbel 1x12-fach DUB Wide | 170 mm | Kettenblatt 40 Zähne
    28.99