SKU: 10431406882
1930s evening dress

1930s evening dress Size 12 1930s Evening Dress - Sheer Black Chiffon & Rhinestones

Sale price$19.46 Regular price$21.62
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $5.41 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1930s evening dress Size 12 1930s Evening Dress - Sheer Black Chiffon & RhinestonesExquisite 1930s evening dress in sheer black chiffon, sprinkled with rhinestone stardust! This willowy bias cut formal gown is see through and sleeveless with a V point neckline, ruched shoulders, rich gathers under the bust, and a fitted waist panel front & back. The bias cut skirt is flared beautifully to the ankle, and has a dancing loop hidden inside the hem. Ladies' Size 11 to 12 Measurements Bust 37. 5, Waist 31, Hip up to 46; Shoulder to Waist

Exquisite 1930s evening dress in sheer black chiffon, sprinkled with rhinestone stardust! This willowy bias-cut formal gown is see-through and sleeveless with a V-point neckline, ruched shoulders, rich gathers under the bust, and a fitted waist panel front & back. The bias-cut skirt is flared beautifully to the ankle, and has a dancing loop hidden inside the hem.

Ladies' Size
11 to 12

Measurements
Bust 37.5, Waist 31, Hip up to 46; Shoulder to Waist 16.5, Shoulder to Hem 54 Inches

Era
1930s

Label
None, feels like it was made by a dressmaker, hem is hand-sewn

Materials
Sheer black chiffon, probably rayon; clear prong-set rhinestones

Closure
Side seam metal zipper with rectangular pull by ' CONMAR '

Condition
Good

Condition Detail
Very good for its age, occasional rhinestones have a partial hole around them where the rhinestone's metal setting has abraded the chiffon (a total of six to the sides of the torso, approx 4-5 elsewhere in random isolated places); the V-neck and a few seams have been invisibly re-sewn; has a tiny repair high at the left shoulder seam near the ruching, and a large (4 inch) repaired tear low at back skirt, with an area of 4-5 re-sewn smaller holes below this a few inches above the back skirt hem, slightly noticeable when worn; a scant few hints of holes and light specks at lower right hip, not noticeable

Washing Instructions
Dry clean only if necessary, must be cleaned by hand by a cleaner experienced with antique clothing

Please note: All measurements (bust - waist - hip) are the maximum body measurements that will fit the item. These measurements already have ease subtracted and they are not actual fabric widths. To get actual fabric widths add two inches at the bust - one inch at the waist and two inches at the hip.

Size listed is a modern size. Any available vintage size is noted in the Label description. Please remember vintage sizes and modern sizes can vary a great deal.

Additional photos are often available.
Please let us know if you have any questions!

Shop thousands of vintage clothes in one place with VintageVixen!
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 10431406882

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 1930s evening dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
S. Langley
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
A
This is a great resource. I thought I created great presentations before. Reading this made me realize the mistakes I was making and have me a process for really improving my decks
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2014
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025

recommand products