SKU: 12279264579
1930's bias cut dress

1930's bias cut dress RH1329 — 1930s Bias-cut Slip sewing pattern – Reconstructing History

Sale price$24.24 Regular price$26.93
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $6.73 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 25 - Aug 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1930's bias cut dress RH1329 — 1930s Bias-cut Slip sewing pattern – Reconstructing HistoryBuy this 1930s Bias Cut Slip pattern and make the perfect 30s underwear! Based on an original pattern from the early 1930s, this bias cut slip is the essential underthing for long and slinky 1930s dresses and frocks. Slip is cut on the bias and fitted over the bust for curve clinging perfection. Wear it under your modern clothing as your own 30s style secret! Fits busts 28" to 48". All sizes in one envelope. Also included are assembly instructions,

Buy this 1930s Bias-Cut Slip pattern and make the perfect 30s underwear!

Based on an original pattern from the early 1930s, this bias-cut slip is the essential underthing for long and slinky 1930s dresses and frocks. Slip is cut on the bias and fitted over the bust for curve-clinging perfection. Wear it under your modern clothing as your own 30s style secret!

Fits busts 28" to 48". All sizes in one envelope. 

Also included are assembly instructions, embellishment suggestions, and the extensive historical notes you've come to expect from Reconstructing History.

Suggested Fabrics: silk satin, charmeuse, rayon, crepe de chine, handkerchief linen, batiste, Celanese, Bemberg, or any lingerie fabric
Notions: lace trim optional
Yardage Requirements: 3.5 yards 40" wide or 2.5 yards 54" wide for slip 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 12279264579

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 1930's bias cut dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.0 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Jennifer
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
Love love thank you
Format: Paperback
Love it!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2019
M
Verified Purchase
Michael R. Stolze
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Book!
Format: Paperback
Great Book!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2018
P
Verified Purchase
People's Church uu
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Five Stars
Format: Paperback
This product is awesome
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2017
B
Verified Purchase
brandon holmes
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 5
great
Format: Paperback
all the comics are good and cheap
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2014
T
Verified Purchase
Tom Trails
Draper, US
★★★★★ 1
I love the show, hate this book
Format: Paperback
The Simpsons is one of the funniest TV shows ever. It doesn't translate well to paper at all in this book. This is not funny. It reads like some wannabe comedy writer trying to imitate the Simpsons. The book's credits list Matt Groening as the the "publisher". It lists 7 writers, none of whom is Groening. It also lists a creative director, art director, and multiple "contributing artists", none of whom are Groening. In fact, comparing the list of writers for this book to the list of the show's writers on Wikipedia, none of the show's writers contributed to this book. Maybe that's why it doesn't feel like the show at all. Same characters, lame dialogue, not funny. Too bad.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 20, 2008

recommand products