SKU: 47199365741
green maxi dress with sleeves

green maxi dress with sleeves Maxi Dress Button Front | Green | Long Sleeve | Sustainable Clothing

Sale price$22.70 Regular price$25.22
Save 10%
Size: 4

Pay in installments of $6.30 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 28 - Aug 2

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

green maxi dress with sleeves Maxi Dress Button Front | Green | Long Sleeve | Sustainable ClothingOne of the most striking and flexible pieces in the collection is Intentions emerald green long sleeve chiffon maxi dress. This show stopping choice, Made in the USA from 100% recycled polyester chiffon from PET bottles, is a gorgeous option for your eco friendly wardrobe. It has been carefully designed to allow you endless styling options. Whether you are headed to the beach and want the perfect bathing suit cover or you are headed to dinner and want

 

One of the most striking and flexible pieces in the collection is Intention’s emerald green long sleeve chiffon maxi dress. This show-stopping choice, Made in the USA from 100% recycled polyester chiffon from PET bottles, is a gorgeous option for your eco-friendly wardrobe. It has been carefully designed to allow you endless styling options. Whether you are headed to the beach and want the perfect bathing suit cover or you are headed to dinner and want to crank the vavoom factor up as the night goes on, this dress can be as sexy or serene as you want. The fabric is dip-dyed, features OEKO-TEX 100 certification, and is GRS certified.


Our button-up maxi can be unbuttoned as high as you like to showcase your legs or worn more conservatively such as Kurti-style or duster style over our stretch ankle pants and top. When you commit to a more earth-friendly wardrobe, layering and styling are everything, that’s why this emerald green mess chiffon weave maxi dress will be a favorite in your eco-closet. If you prefer full coverage as opposed to any sheerness, then this is the Maxi Dress for you. 


From the floating bishop sleeves, with their intricate tailor-made stretch cuffs, to the dramatic, lightly gathered dress tiers that look picture perfect in the breeze, this is one of the most complemented pieces in the collection. This button-up emerald green maxi dress is free from harmful chemicals and dipped dyed for an earth-friendly addition to your fashion essential’s wardrobe. 


DETAILS: 

  • Not see-through
  • Long sleeve maxi dress 
  • Optional 72 inch emerald green chiffon self-belt  
  • No distracting belt loops allow for freedom of styling 
  • Button-up  
  • Collarless 
  • Lightly gathered skirt tiers allow for tailoring length
  • Natural shell buttons 
  • OEKO-TEX® 100 certification
  • GRS Certified 
  • Intention takes MCS - Multiple Chemical Sensitivity* seriously and is proud to offer a solution to the many suffering from this medically and environmentally damaging dye processes still in use today.  

  • FABRIC & CARE:

      • Machine wash cold, gentle cycle or hand wash. Like colors only. Turn inside out. Only non-chlorine bleach when needed. Do not iron. Lay flat to dry.
      • 100% recycled polyester chiffon from PET bottles (Imported)

        Shipping Notes
        • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
        • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
        • Delivery to the USA:
        1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
        • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
        Exchange/Return Notes
        • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
        • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
        • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
        • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
        SKU: 47199365741

        Discover Niche Categories That Outsell green maxi dress with sleeves

        Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

        4.9 ★★★★★
        Based on 9 reviews
        Sort
        Highest Rating
        Newest First
        Oldest First
        Product Reviews
        B
        Verified Purchase
        Bob Goldrick
        Bozeman, US
        ★★★★★ 5
        Epson ET-8500 versus Canon G620
        I am an accomplished amateur photographer, not a professional or a techie. I take photos with an iPhone 12 and a Panasonic SLR. I do not make highly technical adjustments to the images. Both of these printers produce excellent results. I purchased them for two reasons: saving on ink, and printing photographs with accurate colors. I have used Canon Pixma printers for decades, so I first tried the G620. Although I do most of my shopping on Amazon I purchased it at Best Buy for ease of potential return. It cost $330 (rounded up by a penny). THE CANON G620: PRO’s: It was easy to fill the six ink tanks. Canon cleverly designed the tops of each one so they can only be inserted into the correct tanks. No problem connecting to my wi-fi. Documents printed quickly and looked fine. The first 4x6 print I did was acceptable but not as good as I had expected. I corrected this quickly per the next bullet. By default my Windows laptop installed its own drivers for the printer. These are not as good as Canon’s. I went to the Canon website and downloaded and installed their drivers for the 6 series. Voila, very good photos, with accurate color and sharp edges! Thanks to other Amazon reviewers for calling this to my attention. Photos printed quickly enough. CON’S: The most significant one, and why I switched to the Epson, is the paper handling. There is only one input tray, at the rear of the printer, which takes all sizes and types: 8x11 plain paper, 4x6, 5x7 and 8x11 photo paper, etc. At first I didn’t think I’d mind changing the paper, but after a while I did, per next bullet. The display on the top of the printer is small, dim and awkwardly placed. I thought I might not need to use it that much, but every time you change paper you have to. You need to pull the output tray out manually. No big deal if you are at your desk, but if you are in another room and want to print out an item on your phone you have to go the printer. A minor inconvenience but a nettlesome one at times. THE EPSON ET-8500:. PRO’s: Equally easy to connect to wi-fi. Even easier to set up. The correct drivers were downloaded automatically. A terrific screen on the right front of the printer. Large, bright, easy to use. Two input trays at the front, one for 4x6 and 5x7 photo paper, the other for 8x11 paper of either type. Another input tray at the back! I use this on the relatively few occasions I print 8x11 photos, and I keep plain paper in the front tray. This is extremely convenient. When you send an item to the printer it wakes up even if it’s turned off. The G620 did not do that. The output tray comes out automatically; no need to pull it. There is a button on the screen for pushing the output tray back in and closing the front. That bright tilt-able front screen has every setting you need and is very intuitive. Everything I printed came out fine and quickly. The photos were equal to Canon’s in quality, plus there is an Epson app for making further adjustments to them. I downloaded it and found it easy to use. CON’s: The cost: $700. That’s more than double the Canon G620, which is a significant consideration. Two others that are not significant. The photo tray can be a little tricky to pull out and a tight fit when reinserting (it goes well toward the back). This can be relieved by first pulling out the 8x11 tray underneath it, giving your fingers more room. Not really a con but when the printer is finished the screen shows two items: a little Home icon on the left and a larger “Troubleshooting” message next to that. Some users might think that means there was a problem, but it’s just in case there was. Touch Home and you’re set, then touch the Close Tray button on the bottom right. BOTTOM LINE: You may be wondering, Why spend that much more? And, why not buy a Canon Ink Tank printer of equivalent cost? Re the first, for the convenience of the paper handling and ease of use of the screen. I keep printers a long time and the cost spreads out over the years, especially not needing to buy cartridges. Re the second, I did research those, but prefer the size of the Epson, which is comparable to the G620. The higher priced Canons that I looked at were bulkier. I hope this helps others. If I omitted anything you think should be included, or if you have questions or a difference of opinion, leave a comment and I’ll respond to it.
        WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
        Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2022
        G
        Verified Purchase
        G. Heumann
        West Palm Beach, US
        ★★★★★ 5
        Very happy! ALMOST perfect.
        I have a home based small business - I print a lot of user guides, invoices, etc. Long time Epson user, most recently had a Epson Workforce Pro WF-4820 to compare this to. On the plus side, the ET-8500 is smaller, quieter, and even plain paper prints that combine text and photos look better. And of course, the ink tanks are a big advantage. I don't know how many thousands of dollars of ink I bought for that 4820. The marketing says the ET-8500 produces "lab quality color prints" and I do use my printer for photos on occasion. What they say is true. On premium glossy paper, the photo quality is absolutely outstanding! :) A couple of minor negatives - The biggest one is that the tray holds much less paper. Not a huge deal but worth knowing if you're a heavy user. The ET-8500 is a little slower for duplex printing but otherwise speed is good. I had one bit of confusion as I was trying out all the functions - I loaded a sheet of paper in the rear feeder to try it, and pressed "copy". Even though the printer recognized I had put paper in the rear feeder, instead it copied nothing and spat out a piece of paper from the main tray. I assumed the rear feeder didn't work. A call to Epson Support was very well handled though, and I learned a) this is NOT an automatic document feeder - a feature the WF-4820 did have (but that I hardly ever use) - it is only an alternate way of loading a sheet of paper (such as for loading a sheet of photo paper when you have plain paper in the main tray) AND it will not feed paper from the rear tray for copying - only for printing. I'm not upset about this, but the documentation was sorely lacking in pointing this out and there were no error messages. Lastly, the printer looks very nice when all closed up. When you print, it automatically opens and extends the output tray. Nice. But it doesn't put it away again - you have to do that manually from the front panel. Sure would be nice if there were an option to retract it automatically when the printer goes to sleep.
        WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
        Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2025
        G
        Verified Purchase
        Glenda Breland
        Grantham, US
        ★★★★★ 5
        Vibrant Results and Great Value!
        Size: 13"*19", Color: 150 sheets
        HTVRONT Sublimation Paper 13x19 inches – 150 Sheets Review I recently purchased the HTVRONT Sublimation Paper (13x19 inches, 150 sheets, 120g) and I’m genuinely impressed with the results! As someone who does a lot of sublimation printing for both personal and small business projects, I found this paper to be a fantastic choice. Pros: Excellent Print Quality: The colors transfer beautifully and vibrantly onto my blanks. Images come out crisp and true to the original design. Generous Size: The 13x19 inch sheets are perfect for larger projects like T-shirts, tote bags, and even custom pillowcases. It’s great not having to piece together smaller sheets. Easy to Use: The paper feeds smoothly through my inkjet printer with no jams or smudging. Instructions were clear, making the process straightforward even for beginners. Consistent Results: Every sheet in the pack performed consistently, with no noticeable defects or wasted paper. Value for Money: With 150 sheets in the pack, it’s a great deal for the price, especially for anyone who does frequent sublimation work. Cons: Requires Sublimation Ink: Just a reminder that you’ll need sublimation ink for best results (not regular inkjet ink). Storage: The large size means you’ll need a bit of space to store the pack, but that’s a minor issue. Overall: I highly recommend the HTVRONT Sublimation Paper for anyone looking for reliable, high-quality results. It’s perfect for both hobbyists and small business owners. I’ll definitely be purchasing again!
        WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
        Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2025
        M
        Verified Purchase
        Maryann Cairo
        Battle Creek, US
        ★★★★★ 5
        Excellent Sublimation Paper – Perfect Prints Every Time!
        Size: 8.5"*11", Color: 150 sheets
        This sublimation paper is fantastic! It’s high-quality and works perfectly with my sublimation printer. The prints come out vibrant, sharp, and transfer beautifully onto mugs, shirts, and other materials without smudging or fading. The paper is easy to handle, doesn’t jam in the printer, and holds the ink well for a clean transfer. I’ve tried other brands before, but this one consistently gives professional-looking results. Definitely a must-have for anyone doing sublimation printing!
        WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
        Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2025
        K
        Verified Purchase
        Kelly Farrow
        Pawtucket, US
        ★★★★★ 5
        This paper prints beautifully!
        Size: 8.5"*11", Color: 150 sheets
        Great sublimation paper. I usually use A Sub but ordered this because it delivered faster, and now this is the paper I’ll be using! It prints wonderfully! The ink release is amazing! There’s hardly any ink left in the paper and my shirts look incredible. The paper is a great weight and doesn’t jam at all. If you’ve been disappointed with your sub print quality, give this paper a try. You won’t be disappointed!
        WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
        Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2026

        recommand products