SKU: 94670274301
1920 women dress

1920 women dress 1920s reproduction day dress in navy blue and white

Sale price$26.20 Regular price$29.11
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.28 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 25 - Aug 30

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1920 women dress 1920s reproduction day dress in navy blue and whiteThis 1920s reproduction day dress is made of cotton in navy blue with white contrast details. It is a handmade navy drop waist flapper dress, that can be worn as a Great Gatsby dress, a 1920s sailor dress or a roaring 20s tea dress, among others. This style 1920s fashion was very popular in the roaring twenties. We have a similar dress but made of chiffon fabrics which can be found here. More navy look dresses can be found here. More dark blue dresses

This 1920s reproduction day dress is made of cotton in navy blue with white contrast details. It is a handmade navy drop waist flapper dress, that can be worn as a Great Gatsby dress, a 1920s sailor dress or a roaring 20s tea dress, among others. This style 1920s fashion was very popular in the roaring twenties.

We have a similar dress but made of chiffon fabrics which can be found here.

More navy look dresses can be found here.

More dark blue dresses can be found here.

  • This item is made to order and is not in stock
  • The current production time is stated on the announcement bar on the top of this page.
  • Since the product is yet to be made, there is an opportunity to customize it based on your body measurements and height. Check the Size Chart and if you are not sure which size to choose or need a custom size, please Contact Us before placing your order.

 DRESS DESIGN

This pretty cotton 1920s dress in navy blue with white contrast details features a zig zag seam connecting the bodice and skirt, which was a popular style during the 20s. The dress comes with short sleeves and a scoop neckline, decorated with a sash tie.

The design is drop waist and loose fitting with the bodice almost straight. The dress is fully lined with dark blue rayon lining fabric, has no zipper, and can be slipped on through the head. Thanks to its loose-fitting design. The dress length is a couple of inches below the knee or depending on your height. Check length details below for each size.

Please note that because of its drop waist, the dress will look less flattering and period correct if you are a lot taller or shorter than the recommended height for each size outlined below. If you have a shorter or longer body length we recommend ordering a custom size. There are no extra charges. Contact us for this.

NB: The accessories (necklace, gloves, hats) are not included in the listing.

SIZES

The dress is available in 4 regular sizes, S, M, L, XL, and custom sizes for up to person's bust of 48 inches. The measurements of bust, waist and hips below are of a person’s BODY, not the dress itself.

See Detailed Size Guide 

If you are not sure about sizing, kindly contact us with your body measurements and height. We are more than happy to help you choose the right size.

*The model wears a custom dress based on her body measurements and height.

CUSTOMIZATION

Make sure you know your 'exact' body measurements, which have been measured correctly as instructed in the Size Chart. If you are between sizes send us your measurements and height. We will help consider whether you need a custom size. Most of the time we encourage you have your clothes customized to your body measurements and height so that they fit well, correctly and are body flattering. And you will look great and feel confident in them. We offer custom orders of up to person's bust of 48”. There are no extra fees for size customization. However, a custom item cannot be returned for refund or exchange. Please contact us first if you would like a custom item before placing your order.

CARE

Hand wash in cool water (30 C). Hang to dry inside out and press with medium heat.

 

CONTACT US IN CASE OF QUESTIONS

We are based in Thailand. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have questions about this dress or anything in our shop.

Happy shopping.
- Thongbai, on behalf of the La Vie Delight Team.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 94670274301

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell 1920 women dress

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 10 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
E
Verified Purchase
erika
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 4
They are good
They were really good with nice flavor just not sour
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 20, 2023
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Lowell, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015

recommand products